Mate, you question somebody else's motives for supporting Israel but when your motives are challenged by the exact same method you ask for literary proof. You can't persecute somebody for having an opinion because it doesn't conform to your ideal, you inferred that 83 had warped logic but when I applied the same warped logic to your opinion you instantly defended yourself and demanded proof. This has nothing to do with Boko Haram, but you haven't voiced your concerns for those kidnap victims as often as you have voiced your concerns over the Gazan victims. Why are you determining where the line is in the sand for where others with differentiating opinions can form an opinion over this? The world is a ****ing hell-hole and this is one example of a ****ed up crisis zone, it is never going to be facts vs lies, there's a tangled web of lies and facts that nobody can pick apart.
The Americans are probably happy for Israel to target Islamic terrorists yes, so am ****ing I. I have said it enough times, I care not for the collateral as I don't believe they share a logical and equal value of human life as I would expect from a civilised religion, the region refuse to be educated and are born, indoctrinated and developed to fear god, a recipe for war, proven time and time again.
As for your earlier question, I'd have been on the side of the British, that's where my allegiance lies and after that I couldn't care too much, I thought I'd made that perfectly clear. If you're suggesting I'm pro-Jewish you're putting words in my mouth, please don't bother.
