Gaa

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
You are a bitter blinkered fool rebel.

As evidenced by?

1
Glasgow Rangers never had a religion tick box on any registration form either yet a vast majority of the Celtic support claim Rangers had a sectarian signing policy. Either both are sectarian or neither are.

are you suggesting that Rangers never had a sectarian signing policy? Or that the GAA did, or does? A comparison that only a ****wit would make.



Depending on the organisation, sectarian killings were common place during the troubles and committed by the IRA and loyalist groups. Support of these groups is deemed sectarian because it shows support of the sectarian acts perpetrated by these groups. Regardless, what has the idolisation of murderers to with sport?
Name the club, county, cup, person, anything associated with sectarian killing?

He plead guilty but sentence would have been passed on the acts he plead guilty to. He was therefore punished for wearing that T-shirt because of the sectarian slogan and offence it caused. If it wasn't sectarian, he would not have been punished.
Nothing at all was proven. It is why they have this thing called 'not guilty'....it isn't a difficult concept.

****ing moron.
and yet somehow still able to refute your ****ty arguments with great ease
 
Well said.<applause>

As for the F word. Originally the name had nothing to do with religion. But looking on dictionary.com Here is what it gives as a definition.

1. a member of an Irish revolutionary organization founded in New York in 1858, which worked for the establishment of an independent Irish republic.
2. (in late Irish legends) a member of a group of warriors always ready to defend Ireland against its enemies.


It has since become a word used a sectarian slur.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fenian

so case closed then?

You joker. that is twice in one thread you cite something that totally and utterly makes you look like a spastic.

Time to give it up.
 
Rebel, Mr T and Medro are PWNING you with consummate aplomb.

Your dream of a united Direland will never happen with such blinkered views being expressed by the Nationalist communities ie. YOU.

You must log in or register to see images
 
Rebel boy you seem to have quite a few double standards when it comes to trying to get your point across ie Sectarian signing policy and dictionary meanings.

Both Hun and Fenian are sectarian slurs.<ok>
 
Rebel, Mr T and Medro are PWNING you with consummate aplomb.

Your dream of a united Direland will never happen with such blinkered views being expressed by the Nationalist communities ie. YOU.

You must log in or register to see images

Are they lulling me into a false sense of security by coming up with **** arguments or something?.....
 
Rebel boy you seem to have quite a few double standards when it comes to trying to get your point across ie Sectarian signing policy and dictionary meanings.

Both Hun and Fenian are sectarian slurs.<ok>

Then point them out for me?

Both Hun and Fenian are sectarian slurs.<ok>

And you evidence this by citing a legal case that offered no precedent and an anti sectarian organisation that concedes that it isn't.

Give it a rest now. You have lost the argument several pages ago.
 
Then point them out for me?

And you evidence this by citing a legal case that offered no precedent and an anti sectarian organisation that concedes that it isn't.

Give it a rest now. You have lost the argument several pages ago.

So can you explain why the fella was charged and found guilty of RELIGIOUSLY AGGRAVATED breach of the peace?

And if you look at the Nil By Mouth statement, you will see that to their knowledge the origions of the word have no ties with a certain religion. Much like the F word as I have pointed out, but that does not mean it is NOT sectarian

"The use of the word "hun" in and around Scottish football has been long debated. While this word has no definition rooted in a particular religious denomination to our knowledge, I think that any reasonable person would agree that it is clearly used here with the intention of being offensive. We recognise that the use of this word does cause sectarian offence when used with other terms of a specifically religious nature. Nil by Mouth do no accept sectarianism in any of its forms or however it's dressed up."

But what do you make of this statement on their website;

Offensive sectarian language is still used in Scotland on a daily basis, with abusive terms such as &#8220;Hun&#8221; and &#8220;Orange bastard&#8221; being used negatively against Protestants.
 
I give up. It's only possible to debate with someone if their relative intelligence allows. Rebel - you're not bright enough to hold a mop let alone a conversation.
 
YOU HAVE LOST.

arguing a point you have already lost is ****ing stupid.

Lost what?

Can you explain why the fella was charged and found guilty of RELIGIOUSLY AGGRAVATED breach of the peace and simply not breach of the peace?

A simple answer please?

Also you can't look at a quote from Nil by Mouth and then ignore content published on their website.

But like I say, if you are so confident that it is not sectarian get on to some police Facebook pages and throw the word about there. If there is nothing wrong with it, nothing will happen. If there is something wrong with it the police will have your details and will be contact with you.
 
I give up. It's only possible to debate with someone if their relative intelligence allows. Rebel - you're not bright enough to hold a mop let alone a conversation.


Game, set & match to MrT <laugh>

Wee Webel torn a new wan again <laugh>
 
I give up. It's only possible to debate with someone if their relative intelligence allows. Rebel - you're not bright enough to hold a mop let alone a conversation.

who the **** are you?

You can name call to your hearts content. I refuted your piss-poor argument easily. If you can't offer anything in response, then obviously I am intelligent enough to deal with you.
 
Lost what?

Can you explain why the fella was charged and found guilty of RELIGIOUSLY AGGRAVATED breach of the peace and simply not breach of the peace?

A simple answer please?

Also you can't look at a quote from Nil by Mouth and then ignore content published on their website.

But like I say, if you are so confident that it is not sectarian get on to some police Facebook pages and throw the word about there. If there is nothing wrong with it, nothing will happen. If there is something wrong with it the police will have your details and will be contact with you.

Read the thread. You are either a liar, or stupid
 
I'm MrT, clearly.

You didn't refute anything. You talked round them without offering any constructive points. Now pick up that mop and stop dribbling.

The GAA Is not sectarian, neither is the term HUN. <ok>