As evidenced by? are you suggesting that Rangers never had a sectarian signing policy? Or that the GAA did, or does? A comparison that only a ****wit would make. Name the club, county, cup, person, anything associated with sectarian killing? Nothing at all was proven. It is why they have this thing called 'not guilty'....it isn't a difficult concept. and yet somehow still able to refute your ****ty arguments with great ease
I never considered Fenian a setarian slur, the knucklescrapers from the Shankill, Village, Tigers bay may use it as such but it is actually quite a complementary remark to make to someone.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fenian so case closed then? You joker. that is twice in one thread you cite something that totally and utterly makes you look like a spastic. Time to give it up.
Rebel, Mr T and Medro are PWNING you with consummate aplomb. Your dream of a united Direland will never happen with such blinkered views being expressed by the Nationalist communities ie. YOU. please log in to view this image
Rebel boy you seem to have quite a few double standards when it comes to trying to get your point across ie Sectarian signing policy and dictionary meanings. Both Hun and Fenian are sectarian slurs.
Are they lulling me into a false sense of security by coming up with **** arguments or something?.....
Then point them out for me? And you evidence this by citing a legal case that offered no precedent and an anti sectarian organisation that concedes that it isn't. Give it a rest now. You have lost the argument several pages ago.
So can you explain why the fella was charged and found guilty of RELIGIOUSLY AGGRAVATED breach of the peace? And if you look at the Nil By Mouth statement, you will see that to their knowledge the origions of the word have no ties with a certain religion. Much like the F word as I have pointed out, but that does not mean it is NOT sectarian "The use of the word "hun" in and around Scottish football has been long debated. While this word has no definition rooted in a particular religious denomination to our knowledge, I think that any reasonable person would agree that it is clearly used here with the intention of being offensive. We recognise that the use of this word does cause sectarian offence when used with other terms of a specifically religious nature. Nil by Mouth do no accept sectarianism in any of its forms or however it's dressed up." But what do you make of this statement on their website; Offensive sectarian language is still used in Scotland on a daily basis, with abusive terms such as “Hun” and “Orange bastard” being used negatively against Protestants.
I give up. It's only possible to debate with someone if their relative intelligence allows. Rebel - you're not bright enough to hold a mop let alone a conversation.
Lost what? Can you explain why the fella was charged and found guilty of RELIGIOUSLY AGGRAVATED breach of the peace and simply not breach of the peace? A simple answer please? Also you can't look at a quote from Nil by Mouth and then ignore content published on their website. But like I say, if you are so confident that it is not sectarian get on to some police Facebook pages and throw the word about there. If there is nothing wrong with it, nothing will happen. If there is something wrong with it the police will have your details and will be contact with you.
who the **** are you? You can name call to your hearts content. I refuted your piss-poor argument easily. If you can't offer anything in response, then obviously I am intelligent enough to deal with you.
I wondered why a thread about the worst sport on the planet had reached 10 pages. Bigotry might of known FTP GSTQ WATP KAT UVF UDA RFC 1690 and the rest
I'm MrT, clearly. You didn't refute anything. You talked round them without offering any constructive points. Now pick up that mop and stop dribbling.
