I saw all the home games last season and as it progressed it was obvious that the other teams had sussed us out and in the end Laudrup had to go as other managers in the same situation would have had to. Whether Monk was the right appointment only time will tell. If he is not I hope sentiment does not stand in the way and the right decision is made sooner than later.
I actually Think laudrup was well aware of that and thats why he wanted us to move it forward through the middle faster, problem was that aint leons game and a few others perhaps wernt quite up to it, hence when it worked it was sublime and when it didnt we were bang average .
IMO we Are revertimg back to what was well and truely worked out, monk then experimented with a similar formation against Southampton and got it wrong .
Laudrup tried to evolve us but for some reason something was stopping the progression. Our best fluid football last season was with his players in the team. Valencia away,man utd in the cup,palace away .
Laudrup knew we could keep it better than most but his idea was to move it faster, huw jenkins talked about our principles being eroded away but from a football perspective you cant stand still.
Its no suprise that monks toughest games were against the so called lesser teams playing what he knew best, standard rodgers ball .laudrups record against the so called lesser teams was very good because our players were able to move it better against lesser players and it was ta tactically fresher .
Its perhaps another reason why laudrups top targets were pacy forwards, aspas,chadli,and the kid that went to dortmumd .
We had bony who is awesome but maybe a slight adjustment to how laudrup wanted us to operate.
Liverpool this season was where IMO laudrup wanted to go, we have alot of senior players that Are very comfortable playing a certain way, pushing them to act,react and move the ball faster was always going to be a struggle for some and thats why IMO results were a bit up and down sometimes.
Monk is a smart guy and Will come to the same conclusions as laudrup but maybe wont try and please everyone, , we dont know if he has the players to carry it off though .
It would also explain why There was a split, some buying into a progressive style and some not wanting to .
Just my take on it
