thanks so the profit shouwld be for example 75mil - 8.5mil but on the balance sheet the intangible assets would reduce in theory (unitl new layers added), the debtors could increase and for example cash on hand could increase to balance where the profit goes?
Why are you all so interested in the accounting niceties of the proposed transfer to Barca? You can be more than sure that JH will have his arse covered with bonds and insurances for every penny that remains outstanding when ink finally hits paper. The bean counters can present it any way they want (or are allowed to) but deal-makers like JH will not be leaving their backsides exposed.
Because its more interesting than debating the morals of Luis Suarez or the impending arrival of Ben Davies?
They have to pay for members of 'independent' panels to come up with the verdicts they're told to, of course. And barristers cost too to challenge UEFA bans on Rooney, that you'd actually increase if the same argument was put forward as an appeal in against a domestic ban.
I think they would have possibly over-turned it if he had apologised immediately rather than come out with some many blatant lies denying it took place, when the whole world saw what happened, and his reaction afterwards when he held his teeth pretty much showed that he knew instantly he'd done something wrong. If his apology had actually been meant rather than just lip service in an attempt to get it over-turned, I don't think the whole of Uruguay calling them fascists helped much either. Lets face it, he's not sorry he bit Chellini for any other reason than because he's been banned for it.
Rubbish. They were going to throw the book at him and they have done. Now after the transfer and the dust has settled, they may use their clout to get him back playing again sooner - but that ain't going to be until he's 100% their player!!
I still don't think saying "the physical result of a bite" is really apologising... even his apology made it sound like an accidental collision between teeth and shoulder rather than an angry bite.
Who really cares? For us the only problem is do we get paid or do we keep him. It's as simple as that.
At this point Barca have agreed to meet his buy-out fee. Now they di that already in the light of his ban. I don't see JH now saying Ok well pay us less!!
If they were merely paying his buyout clause, there'd be no negotiations. As in essence it'd be a 'hostile' purchase, they'd be forced to pay the contract clause figure, with whatever terms are attached to it - the end. The mere fact that you had a 'productive' meeting with them a couple of weeks back and the negotiations are still ongoing, means by definition that the purchase isn't simply a buyout clause activation, you're patently willing to sell and are negotiating a fee / payment profile.
