The "official" all things Suarez thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Tobes said:
The net profit from the sale would be the total fee minus charges, minus the remaining asset value on the balance sheet for him.

If the fee wasn't all paid in one lump, the calculation of the profit would remain the same, but the outstanding amount of unpaid fee would go into your debtors section of the balance sheet.

In terms of the declared net profit, it's the profit from the entire periods player trading / amortisation that matters, not the single transaction, so without knowing what you had / will have due during the full financial year it's impossible to quantify.

Given you're going to have spent more than the fee received during the period anyway, combined with what you've spent in recent seasons, the conversation is probably moot, as it's highly likely that there'll be no net profit when it's all collated.
Click to expand...

thanks so the profit shouwld be for example 75mil - 8.5mil

but on the balance sheet the intangible assets would reduce in theory (unitl new layers added), the debtors could increase and for example cash on hand could increase to balance where the profit goes?
 
Why are you all so interested in the accounting niceties of the proposed transfer to Barca? You can be more than sure that JH will have his arse covered with bonds and insurances for every penny that remains outstanding when ink finally hits paper. The bean counters can present it any way they want (or are allowed to) but deal-makers like JH will not be leaving their backsides exposed.
 
Foredeckdave said:
Why are you all so interested in the accounting niceties of the proposed transfer to Barca? You can be more than sure that JH will have his arse covered with bonds and insurances for every penny that remains outstanding when ink finally hits paper. The bean counters can present it any way they want (or are allowed to) but deal-makers like JH will not be leaving their backsides exposed.
Click to expand...

Because its more interesting than debating the morals of Luis Suarez or the impending arrival of Ben Davies?
 
Gerrez said:
Pretty much my point Tobes <ok>

The 5% on £75 is £3.75m. Bit **** that they get to spunk all that up the wall...<doh>
Click to expand...

They have to pay for members of 'independent' panels to come up with the verdicts they're told to, of course. And barristers cost too to challenge UEFA bans on Rooney, that you'd actually increase if the same argument was put forward as an appeal in against a domestic ban.
 
Suarez's appeal has been rejected so I presume now Barca cant get his ban reduced now.
 
Bindiana said:
Suarez's appeal has been rejected so I presume now Barca cant get his ban reduced now.
Click to expand...

I think they would have possibly over-turned it if he had apologised immediately rather than come out with some many blatant lies denying it took place, when the whole world saw what happened, and his reaction afterwards when he held his teeth pretty much showed that he knew instantly he'd done something wrong. If his apology had actually been meant rather than just lip service in an attempt to get it over-turned, I don't think the whole of Uruguay calling them fascists helped much either. Lets face it, he's not sorry he bit Chellini for any other reason than because he's been banned for it.
 
Miggins said:
I think they would have possibly over-turned it if he had apologised immediately rather than come out with some many blatant lies denying it took place, when the whole world saw what happened, and his reaction afterwards when he held his teeth pretty much showed that he knew instantly he'd done something wrong. If his apology had actually been meant rather than just lip service in an attempt to get it over-turned, I don't think the whole of Uruguay calling them fascists helped much either. Lets face it, he's not sorry he bit Chellini for any other reason than because he's been banned for it.
Click to expand...

Rubbish. They were going to throw the book at him and they have done. Now after the transfer and the dust has settled, they may use their clout to get him back playing again sooner - but that ain't going to be until he's 100% their player!!
 
I still don't think saying "the physical result of a bite" is really apologising... even his apology made it sound like an accidental collision between teeth and shoulder rather than an angry bite.
 
Who really cares? For us the only problem is do we get paid or do we keep him. It's as simple as that.
 
Foredeckdave said:
At this point Barca have agreed to meet his buy-out fee. Now they di that already in the light of his ban. I don't see JH now saying Ok well pay us less!!
Click to expand...

If they were merely paying his buyout clause, there'd be no negotiations.

As in essence it'd be a 'hostile' purchase, they'd be forced to pay the contract clause figure, with whatever terms are attached to it - the end.

The mere fact that you had a 'productive' meeting with them a couple of weeks back and the negotiations are still ongoing, means by definition that the purchase isn't simply a buyout clause activation, you're patently willing to sell and are negotiating a fee / payment profile.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back