New Sponsor?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Thanks for those kind words. However, you did not read my post. I did not say that changing the name will bring investment just that there is a good chance there will be no more investment if Allam (at least from him) does not get his way in changing the name to the Hull Tigers.

So you might want to read my post again. Just so that you can pick up on the main points. Best Team, Best Manager, chance of a Cup Final Place with Europe on the horizon, most generous owners ever-maybe gone for good all because of tradition, not right now, but later when Mr Allam pulls the plug on further investment.

Its really hard to get someone to come up with 70m for a football team that has seen a paucity of success over the years. We are not Man U or Man City or one of the glamor clubs. It takes someone like Mr Allam who had a local connection to make an investment. Thats unless CTWD have got some cash.

Well done you have just cited the reasons why someone just might come up with £70 Million for a football team in the PL
 
Thanks for those kind words. However, you did not read my post. I did not say that changing the name will bring investment just that there is a good chance there will be no more investment if Allam (at least from him) does not get his way in changing the name to the Hull Tigers.

So you might want to read my post again. Just so that you can pick up on the main points. Best Team, Best Manager, chance of a Cup Final Place with Europe on the horizon, most generous owners ever-maybe gone for good all because of tradition, not right now, but later when Mr Allam pulls the plug on further investment.

Its really hard to get someone to come up with 70m for a football team that has seen a paucity of success over the years. We are not Man U or Man City or one of the glamor clubs. It takes someone like Mr Allam who had a local connection to make an investment. Thats unless CTWD have got some cash.

Talking of not reading, you obviously didn't read what Ehab said when he categorically stated "we have no more to give" - changing the name of our club won't suddenly make Ehab remember they've got a few million quid in the wardrobe that they'd forgotten about.

The name change is nothing to do with further investment from the Allams themselves; even they haven't made that claim so you're barking up the wrong tree.
 
"#hcafc are aiming to have two different shirt sponsors this season. One for the Premier League & one for the Europa League and cups."

Interesting.
 
Good marketing?..or does it perhaps hijack a deal with a big sponsor who wants exposure in prem AND europe?

It could be a company that has different entities within it, or one that owns others.

For example the league shirt could be sky tv with SkyBet on the cup shirt, similar to how we used to have kc/Karoo on the away/home shirt respectively.

Or the other example could be Volkswagen in the league with Skoda in the cups.

Or it could just be two completely desperate companies, but I find it unlikely any company would make a reasonable offer for such a deal.
 
It could be a company that has different entities within it, or one that owns others.

For example the league shirt could be sky tv with SkyBet on the cup shirt, similar to how we used to have kc/Karoo on the away/home shirt respectively.

Or the other example could be Volkswagen in the league with Skoda in the cups.

Or it could just be two completely desperate companies, but I find it unlikely any company would make a reasonable offer for such a deal.

Yeah same company thing makes sense....but can see stubborn Allem insisting 2 compananies 2 deals ....twice as much cash!..somehow
 
It could be a company that has different entities within it, or one that owns others.

For example the league shirt could be sky tv with SkyBet on the cup shirt, similar to how we used to have kc/Karoo on the away/home shirt respectively.

Or the other example could be Volkswagen in the league with Skoda in the cups.

Or it could just be two completely desperate companies, but I find it unlikely any company would make a reasonable offer for such a deal.

Frosties & Rice Krispies?
 
It could be a company that has different entities within it, or one that owns others.

For example the league shirt could be sky tv with SkyBet on the cup shirt, similar to how we used to have kc/Karoo on the away/home shirt respectively.

Or the other example could be Volkswagen in the league with Skoda in the cups.

Or it could just be two completely desperate companies, but I find it unlikely any company would make a reasonable offer for such a deal
.

Unfortunately, this is the likeliest outcome.
 
The HDM forum is littered with eggchasers who ridicule everything we do. If they sense something is unpopular with City fans they will infest the forum with posts saying just the opposite. Same goes for the majority of texters to sportstalk.
When will you all realise there are many people out there who's worst nightmare is a successful football club in this city ?
And vice versa
 
yeah because they've got the business side of things so wrong up to now haven't they :huh:

£30 mill to well over £100 mill debt in 2 years - pissed of a good proportion of their customer base, season pass renewals well behind last year despite 'greatest ever season' - your right, the business side is a ****ing mess
 
£30 mill to well over £100 mill debt in 2 years - pissed of a good proportion of their customer base, season pass renewals well behind last year despite 'greatest ever season' - your right, the business side is a ****ing mess

That's the outgoings and you'd be complaining if we didn't buy anyone. There must be incoming money!! PL money, sponsorships etc I'm aware we potentially may be running at a loss at the moment but not £100M
 
That's the outgoings and you'd be complaining if we didn't buy anyone. There must be incoming money!! PL money, sponsorships etc I'm aware we potentially may be running at a loss at the moment but not £100M

According to a link posted on another thread, it's £90 mill, but I'm ****e at economics.
 
That's the outgoings and you'd be complaining if we didn't buy anyone. There must be incoming money!! PL money, sponsorships etc I'm aware we potentially may be running at a loss at the moment but not £100M

There's plenty of money coming in, the problem is, it's going out as soon as it arrives.

I don't actually think we're trading at a loss, the problem is the £90-100m debt we ran up before we started breaking even, that we're not paying off.