The Official Suarez "our ****" Thread (closing this thread at noon so get commenting)

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Defore gets booked Suarez gets 10 games. No matter how you try water it down, which you are, by saying the number of times by Luis and Defoe got booked and never did it again, you are way off the mark, had Suarez not done it first time round, 8 games is what he would have got from the FA, they added two to the dutch ban to make it 10

Do you really think he would have got off with it had it been his first time biting? Really? If yes, I have nothing more to say to you really :D

I shouldnt really have to say I am not defending him, I am obviously slating the FA here.

Not defending him my arse you've been attempting exactly that all day, you tit

Try getting your ****ing facts right for once.

For once and for all - the Defoe incident is a total red herring as it was 2006 and the referee saw the incident and booked both players. At that time the FA had no jurisdiction to over rule a referees decision and take retrospective action

So it isn't either hypocrisy, racism, double standards or any of the other bullshit excuses you've been hauling out all ****ing day. As for a man who's not condoning him you're doing a great impression of someone who is, just as you did last time and the time before
 
Bit different this Page, Keane could not have been thought of as premeditated until he admitted he had planned to "get him one day" in his book. At the time it just looked like a really bad tackle.

Not really Diego, it was well known there was previous between the two players.

Fergie knew it was premeditated and used his influence to pretend it wasn't in the aftermath.
 
Alan Shearer another outraged ex-player that was as gentle as a butterfly with the touch of an elephant.

[video=youtube;LPp0teYYi70]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPp0teYYi70[/video]


<whistle>
 
Cantona was even more hilarious, 100 hours community hours for assaulting a spectator for giving him verbals, players get the bollox ripped out of them by opposition fans every week....ask Suarez.<whistle>

Cantona got a 9 month worldwide ban, but don't let facts get in the way of your victim vigil
 
Cantona got a 9 month worldwide ban, but don't let facts get in the way of your victim vigil

Victim vigil?

<laugh>

You are only on here as part of the lynch mob and to gloat tobes, while we are remembering a few things from years gone by while we're waiting for the hanging party to appear.<whistle>
 
Victim vigil?

<laugh>

You are only on here as part of the lynch mob and to gloat tobes, while we are remembering a few things from years gone by while we're waiting for the hanging party to appear.<whistle>

Gloat?

Nah I'm here offering my condolences to the victim in all this. I mean nutting a ref in 2003, biting opponents in 2010, 2013 and 2014 as well as a bit of racial abuse and plenty of cheating and simulation in between, the man's been victimised beyond belief.

Where's the candles?
 
Gloat?

Nah I'm here offering my condolences to the victim in all this. I mean nutting a ref in 2003, biting opponents in 2010, 2013 and 2014 as well as a bit of racial abuse and plenty of cheating and simulation in between, the man's been victimised beyond belief.

Where's the candles?

So you've got all the mitigating evidence of past transgressions on hand.

Bravo.<ok>
 
Cantona got a 9 month worldwide ban, but don't let facts get in the way of your victim vigil

As in if he transferred to another nation fifa confirmed the ban would transfer with him. Which is standard. As I understood it.
 
So you've got all the mitigating evidence of past transgressions on hand.

Bravo.<ok>

Mitigating evidence?

Hahahahaha, I thought you were better than that

The man's a total bell end lad, there's no mitigating evidence at all. He s a ****ing dolt who reacts the same way when things are going against him and he gets frustrated.

Maybe, just maybe, if you lot had actually berated him for his ****ish and totally unacceptable behaviour previously, he wouldn't have given a post match interview yesterday saying it was "just part of the game", which showed he'd learnt **** all from his previous experiences. because he was made to feel that he was guilty of nothing........
 
Yes, he was not reacting to a tackle, he was not trying to win the ball. He was trying to provoke a reaction from the defender in an attempt to win a desperate penalty (the same as he tried with Ivanovich). This is why his bites happen in the box when his team need a goal.

Riiiight.
Thanks for that insight into the mind of a lunatic.
 
Yes, he was not reacting to a tackle, he was not trying to win the ball. He was trying to provoke a reaction from the defender in an attempt to win a desperate penalty (the same as he tried with Ivanovich). This is why his bites happen in the box when his team need a goal.

Any views on this?
 
Mitigating evidence?

Hahahahaha, I thought you were better than that

The man's a total bell end lad, there's no mitigating evidence at all. He s a f**king dolt who reacts the same way when things are going against him and he gets frustrated.

Maybe, just maybe, if you lot had actually berated him for his ****ish and totally unacceptable behaviour previously, he wouldn't have given a post match interview yesterday saying it was "just part of the game", which showed he'd learnt f**k all from his previous experiences. Probably because he was made to feel that he was guilty of nothing........

You been sniffing the whisky glass tobes?

On this thread I've called Suarez a " prick" and a "fool" for what he did, you fellers are funny because even though none of us have condoned his actions you post as if we have.<laugh>
 
Any views on this?

Yes.

Given the circumstances of both bites, his side was losing and he was frustrated, he either bit the CB out of pure frustration or he was trying to get a massive violent reaction i.e. an elbow or a punch in the grid.

Given his previous I'd say either were possible. The mere fact the bell end falls to the turf and grabs his teeth tells you he's capable of anything
 
Cantona was even more hilarious, 100 hours community hours for assaulting a spectator for giving him verbals, players get the bollox ripped out of them by opposition fans every week....ask Suarez.<whistle>

!00 hours community service for a first offence assault is pretty harsh actually, he wasn`t famous he would have got a caution and no more.
 
You been sniffing the whisky glass tobes?

On this thread I've called Suarez a " prick" and a "fool" for what he did, you fellers are funny because even though none of us have condoned his actions you post as if we have.<laugh>

Not read your comments mate in fairness, but you were coming across as an apologist there lad.

I had to double check the name to make sure it was you tbf.........






I thought it was astro <yikes>




<laugh>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.