There was no controversy about that goal. Whoever's controlling these cameras is a right silly ****. They've used it for goals that have hit the net anyway so it clearly isn't necessary, now they're explicitly showing 'No Goal' on the screen when there's clearly a goal. Why would you stop it at the point when it hit the post, how could it possibly have been in at that point?
Yep. I was mystified at the fuss.
Hit the post, hit the keeper, THEN it went in. Easy.
Thanks video.
