Is it fair to speculate that it's nothing to do with Saint's side of the deal, and more to do with better options available to him or am I way off base there? I mean, unless you are one of the biggest clubs in the world, then your players and staff will always be part of the food chain.
Whether or not Spurs is a big step up is another debate, but what I am getting at (badly, admittedly!) is maybe we are debating about MP staying or not depending on promises/assurances being made to him when in fact it could just be down to the fact he considers another club being a better option for his career.