Whose idea was this seat move?

Anyone know how it came about?

I don't believe the hogwash about the team requesting it.

 

It couldn't possibly be the Allams being upset and taking out their anger on someone, could it?

 

It's one of a number of possibilities, but I'm not sure they dreamt it up alone.

 

OLMERT has already explained close to 100 times.

If there was a sniff of Allam malice in it he'd probably know better than most and the position he's in he's obviously report on it.

How many more times do people need telling?

 

I've no idea.

The club or company don't identify themselves - they just use a tiger's head like they don't know what we are called.

That or it's just another transitional stage in this rebranding by stealth that the current owners seem to be implementing.

I don't believe Steve Bruce has strong views on the block moves.

He's simply being used as the acceptable face of HCFC .

 

Could it have something to do with various independent Tigers supporters boards frequently having threads that criticised the lack of singing and the poor placement of the opposing supporters? I don't see why this OP is posing this question; it seems like a shallow effort to bad-mouth the owners which deflects from the real issues and serves no useful purpose. A bad call IMO, but it is just my opinion.

 

I get the impression it's more poor advice than malice, although pissing off E1-E4's probably a bonus.

 

Where have a bad mouthed the owners? That's your false assumption and slant on it, not mine as I've coincidentally posted before that ^^^^.

The lack of singing's liable to be worse after this. It'll eventually settle due to the fans and in spite of this **** up.

Even if it was a good idea, it's been implemented very poorly.


However, that aside, the real question I'm after being answered is, whose idea was it? The clue's in the subject title.

 

The lack of warning (timed after the last home game) means the people cannot organise to sit with mates.

Is it a shambles or a malicious attempt to **** up the block who are the most vocal in opposing the name change madness?

Or both?

Why not put the away fans in N1, N2, N3, N4 ?

Crazy decision on someone's part.

It's like someone wants a squash or polo crowd complete with compliant passive moneyed fans.

 

I don't see anyone from E5 and E6 begging to swap seats.

 

I just think you're a control freak dutch and cant stand the thought of being told its happening.

Its been on the cards for years. Adam wanted it. The Allams have made it happen.

 

Wanna swap seats?

Obviously, a simple seat swap ignores the many other reasons your reply is pithy ****e.

 

Where are you sat? As i posted on the other thread I may go into North Stand when the opportunity comes up.

 

I know of three groups of fans meeting tomorrow to thrash out where the **** they're going to sit next season.

Many of these have been in their seats for a decade.

Turfed out like ****s on somebody's whim with no time to make satisfactory arrangements,

Valued customers?

More like unwanted guests.

These are people who have been putting money into HCFC since before the current owner had even heard of football.

And they'll be there after he ****s off too.

 

You have to have what you're given. You don't expect a choice both ways do you?

So, where's this seat of yours I'm having and I'll ring the club tomorrow and sort it.

 

Aye, we've been ringing and emailing and contacting the club and getting conflicting replies.

Easy for some to try to just dismiss it all.

 

Back to the OP.

Whose idea was it?

 

See my above post. you've got to be in control.

 

Do you gamble that some seats are freed up in other parts of the ground and wait a week or two?

What if they don't get freed up?

Utter shambles.

 

Really? So you've no idea about me, the situation nor how it came about? And you don't seem keen to want to swap.

So, before we were interupted...

Anyone know how this came about?