100k a week is just ****ing weird.
100k a week is just ****ing weird.
Seems way excessive right? I'm not sure they'd realistically go past 50-70. What could he be on here?
Adam Blackmore on Twitter pouring a generous helping of sceptical sauce over everything. Claims story is the same as the Ian Ladyman Daily Mail story from last week, nothing new aside from Moyse sacking.
The key thing will be Shaw himself. If he wants to go, if his family want him to or whatever, then all the club can really do is get the most money possible for him. There is no point having a player around who doesn't want to play for the club, and would rather be at a 'bigger' club. It would be disappointing as I would hope he would stick around with the club a bit longer after what the club, and the coaches have done for his development. But, it is up to him, and £30m would be good money for him.
Adam Blackmore on Twitter pouring a generous helping of sceptical sauce over everything. Claims story is the same as the Ian Ladyman Daily Mail story from last week, nothing new aside from Moyse sacking.
I suppose the same could be said for any story of Shaw leaving, don't think it's to be disregarded on the grounds of "someone's already said Shaw would leave". Plus, the Guardian is different to the Mail.
The key thing will be Shaw himself. If he wants to go, if his family want him to or whatever, then all the club can really do is get the most money possible for him. There is no point having a player around who doesn't want to play for the club, and would rather be at a 'bigger' club. It would be disappointing as I would hope he would stick around with the club a bit longer after what the club, and the coaches have done for his development. But, it is up to him, and £30m would be good money for him.
Hey, same team fella, I'm with you on this. However there are a few wrinkles in the story here.
- Unknown new United manager. Would they spunk 30m and 100k p/w over 5 years on a player that may not be wanted by a new manager?
- In addition to that, would Luke commit to a club in difficulty with no clear direction?
- Insistence of Freddie Kruger that we're not interested in selling.
- Still no direct information, all unnamed sources still.
- Salary seems ludicrous.
This is the most direct, reliable talk yet, however it still seems 'off' somehow. One for the 'wait and see' pile.
Hey, same team fella, I'm with you on this. However there are a few wrinkles in the story here.
- Unknown new United manager. Would they spunk 30m and 100k p/w over 5 years on a player that may not be wanted by a new manager?
- In addition to that, would Luke commit to a club in difficulty with no clear direction?
- Insistence of Freddie Kruger that we're not interested in selling.
- Still no direct information, all unnamed sources still.
- Salary seems ludicrous.
This is the most direct, reliable talk yet, however it still seems 'off' somehow. One for the 'wait and see' pile.
I think any manager would rather have Shaw in than just Buttner. The direction of the club is pretty clear if this is true: they're spending a ****-tonne of money to improve their squad.
I figure most new managers wouldn't mind having a player like Luke dropped on their lap.
Juve going for a forward player that isn't Osvaldo.
Well, Evra is leaving at the end of the season, I think any manager would rather have Shaw in than just Buttner. The direction of the club is pretty clear if this is true: they're spending a ****-tonne of money to improve their squad. Unless we keep players like Shaw, and United continue to stagnate (pretty unlikely), they're always going to be a more attractive club than we are.
Would make the new administration look pretty ****ty though, trumpeting about how we don't need to sell and then flogging the current crown jewel of the academy. I imagine a fair few would be pissed.
If the 100k pw is true Luke would be insane not to take it.
How do you know Evra is leaving at the end of the season? And according to the article you posted, he's going to act as a mentor to Shaw.