Are you angry with Assem for turning what was a very peachy situation into one that is ****ing ****?
The Ballot. What a joke!
- Thread starter DMD
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Are you angry with Assem for turning what was a very peachy situation into one that is ****ing ****?
Newsflash: Thieves steal next week's Tigers ballot results from KC stadium
Sources say 99.9% voted No1 'Hands up who likes me'.
Only one person voted 'No to Hull Tigers'. Ken Shabby of HU12, I hear you're been a naughty boy, don't do that again.
Dinsdale Piranha
All good things come to an end. Goodbye and thanks for everything.
PS Do we get to keep 'the gift'.
Sources say 99.9% voted No1 'Hands up who likes me'.
Only one person voted 'No to Hull Tigers'. Ken Shabby of HU12, I hear you're been a naughty boy, don't do that again.
Dinsdale Piranha
All good things come to an end. Goodbye and thanks for everything.
PS Do we get to keep 'the gift'.
NorthFerribyTiger
Well-Known Member
This is a moot point as their main opposition, CTWD, have always said they object to the name-change but trust their stewardship - personally I think it's somewhat questionable.
It certainly has been by the FA (the people who matter) as they seem set on rejecting the application
It certainly has been by the FA (the people who matter) as they seem set on rejecting the application
Ignore Patty, Willo - he is more and more hysterical and irrational.
I like AA, I just dont like the name change. I dont mind he is crazy, or says crazy things, I even dont mind if he embarasses us once in a while. It might be best if he pisses off though. Its apparant that even if he stayed on after fa decision that he will find some other reason to get pissed off and sell the club. It is probably best he does it now while we are in the PL than have us get relegated and sell when we are in the championship as we are more valuable now.
SOme of you morons are seriously comparing this poll to the situation in Crimea? You make a good case for bringing back National Service, you are beneath contempt in fact.
So the poll, it's actually REALLY fair.
Option 1 = Yes, appeals to me, and other like minded individuals who support the club and the Allams and wouldn't break down at a name change
Option 2 = Obviously appeals to the CTWD sheep who can't face the future with a minor change to the name
Option 3 = Will appeal to the majority of the fans who actually don't give a **** one way or the other
See, that's what you ****ers don't like. They're actually giving the majority of our fans something to place a tick against. It doesn't suit you of course because you need to be able to try and force people to vote for option 2, but now, you can't. This will give the most realistic view of the fans than any simple yes to the tigers, no to the tigers woulda done, and it will hopefully at least stop you from trying to represent the majority of the fans once its released.
Like paying 2 quid, people have a REALLY clear way to express their feelings now. I'd be interested to know if the 1800 member number is actually reflected in the No vote too.
It's a gamble, of course it is, but he's just outsmarted CTWD quite brilliantly. He's even given people a week to vote in too, so if you can't make it tomorrow for whatever reason, or are away all week, you can still send in a vote and it will be counted. The ones who don't vote are quite clearly in the Option 3 camp too, they don't care, they will go regardless, because if they did care, they'd be voting for 1 or 2. It's just brilliant.
The only thing that will remain to be seen is, what will a result of option 3 mean? Hopefully it will give them a chance to figure out a way forward with them still in charge, or ideally Ehab.
I forecast options 1 and 2 will be fairly even with option 3 being way out in front.
So the poll, it's actually REALLY fair.
Option 1 = Yes, appeals to me, and other like minded individuals who support the club and the Allams and wouldn't break down at a name change
Option 2 = Obviously appeals to the CTWD sheep who can't face the future with a minor change to the name
Option 3 = Will appeal to the majority of the fans who actually don't give a **** one way or the other
See, that's what you ****ers don't like. They're actually giving the majority of our fans something to place a tick against. It doesn't suit you of course because you need to be able to try and force people to vote for option 2, but now, you can't. This will give the most realistic view of the fans than any simple yes to the tigers, no to the tigers woulda done, and it will hopefully at least stop you from trying to represent the majority of the fans once its released.
Like paying 2 quid, people have a REALLY clear way to express their feelings now. I'd be interested to know if the 1800 member number is actually reflected in the No vote too.
It's a gamble, of course it is, but he's just outsmarted CTWD quite brilliantly. He's even given people a week to vote in too, so if you can't make it tomorrow for whatever reason, or are away all week, you can still send in a vote and it will be counted. The ones who don't vote are quite clearly in the Option 3 camp too, they don't care, they will go regardless, because if they did care, they'd be voting for 1 or 2. It's just brilliant.
The only thing that will remain to be seen is, what will a result of option 3 mean? Hopefully it will give them a chance to figure out a way forward with them still in charge, or ideally Ehab.
I forecast options 1 and 2 will be fairly even with option 3 being way out in front.
The club's becoming an embarrassment due mainly, but not solely, to AA & his antics. Currently any credible investors or sponsors would be mad to come near us.
I compared it to Crimea AND North Korea (who also just held an election, check the news if you wish) so I am doubly satirical and doubly contemptible
.I hope you're sat down now, you must be dizzy after all that spinning!
There is one thing that was definatley going to happen and that is that you would appear on this post spewing your usual crap. Well done were not disappointed!
Without realising it what you have highlighted is AA face saving get out. If you are right and he lumps together 1 & 3 options as a yes for him, then he will feel that his face has been saved. The FA will see through this rigged vote and still say no. So the name change will not happen, but AA will feel the majority of the fans are with him.
But frankly he is making a mockery of our club, and for this I will never forgive him, No to Hull Tigers.
Theres a proper name for these kind of 'votes' you set me thinking, very good!