Name change discussion
- Thread starter RicardoHCAFC
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Don't need. Feel sue they will get independent company in to do the count, they will walk it.
You people always saying how the 19:04 demonstrates your strength, I've yet to see more than 30% show any interest in joining in.
Have stepped away from the name change discussion since putting my report into the FA, but this will finally put this debate to bed.
If they make it season pass holders only then 75/25 split in favour.
I look forward to the vote.
Exactly what I was thinking.
This is Allam’s last throw of the dice.
As another poster says, there’s a big bullshit propaganda campaign about to start to tantalise the gullible and weak minded.
Let’s hope he gets interviewed asap.
He counts those singing.
One two miss a few, three four miss some more, ninety nine, a hundred.
Can I have a pint of what your on please ! Allam will fall flat on his arse definatly more against than for
I'm starting to think the teddy in his avatar is him.
You're mental John if you believe 70% of fans are pro-name.
I hear other like-minds as you ring in RH and start throwing around figures and percentages like you have.
Figures and percentages you can have no hope of knowing (let alone proving) unless you’ve done some sort of in depth study.
Just throwing in figures like 30% as fact, which you have absolutely no way of proving, not only makes you appear uneducated but it also casts a doubt upon anything else you write.
Further, your E1/E2 claim is also wrong. CTWD support clearly comes from every stand. But if it was true, on top of that, E1 and E2 isn’t 30% of the City crowd.
Can you write anything which is factually correct?
Not 70% pro-name at the moment but less than 30% are against it with all your propaganda, when the vote is taken it will be 70% for.
Bring on the vote....lets kill this debate once and for all.
You need to lay off the ale.
How have you worked that one out again?
Are you seriously suggesting that all the 'fence sitters' would 100% defintely if given the choice change the name?
Also - 30% are against the change?
Hasn't this whole situation been met with widespread condemnation?
Stop making up numbers.