You really haven't ........ just because I'm responding it doesn't mean I'm wound up. What I am is puzzled that an adult can be so tedious & witless yet find himself so funny.
It's only really funny if people post them after they've read your post ...... the only poster who laughs at yours is you. Seriously, I don't care what you post but surely you don't tell 'your lass' how you spend your evenings.
Surely you don't tell your "millionaire friends" how you spend yours...and your daytimes, night times...in fact all day every day.
Anyway mods this has become rather tedious now that Smug has run out of the will to argue and is now just resigned and cumbersome. Like playing with a toy. Please suspend / delete my account. Good times Smug, enjoy France
so its ok to call somebodies mum a c**t ,as long as we know ,amazing ...just close it and be done with it
But not before Sunderlandstu has come back with another snide little dig You're all right, most of the time, but you can be a real hypocrite Stu ....... I was responding to someone calling me a liar without having the balls to back it up. You call me a liar and you've ripped up the rule book, after that there are no rules.
of course its a dig theres some things you just dont say , and you know that ,well out of order wheres it all going to stop
Sorry for the delay but my IP server was down until 11.05. My point on the V-Joe situation was merely to point out Smug's hyprocrisy on two comparable situations. He chose to start the thread and then defend doing it. As I understand it a moron is a person of limited mental capacity and my observations on moronic humour regarding the death of a disabled person were pretty accurate. At least Smug's wife had the good grace to condemn him. Maybe it is a generational thing with me, but I don't go with people who have one set of standards for themselves and one for the rest. As regards stalking Smug, you are of no more consequence to me as the others on this board. I do however reserve the right to point out anomalies in situations.
Whose consensus? I don't post on this forum as much as I used to because of the cliques that have developed, To issue a ban for a bit of banter confirms my judgement to stay well clear. There was one inappropriate comment made during the discourse and it wasn't made by the person who finds themselves banned. The main participants have acted extremely childishly, but for a moderator to intervene and ban someone is tantamount to censorship. Close the thread by all means but a ban is out of order.
