I really think a lot of you are playing the money rather than the man. There is absolutely nothing about his performances that suggest he should be anywhere near the team. We need results and cannot afford to carry anyone. He looks lightweight and is easily dispossessed. I accept that a lot of people know him from his Italian league performances and perhaps from some simulations. But I only know what I have seen and that has been terrible. So he performed well once, that isn't actually much of a big deal considering how much we paid. I appreciate that many think he should therefore have been picked for the next game and that argument has merit, but if he is any good he would be able to perform in more than just one match (when IMHO he was good but hardly world class). We also don't know whether he was completely fit for the next match. I understand that it appears to make financial sense to build up a player who is a major investment, but not to the extent of damaging the possibilities of the team. I really think that there is no argument, other than "he might be better than he appears to be if he had a run in the team", for playing him. And that is not enough when we need every single point. I think he is by far of the "least" of our summer signings. Maybe he will come good, but how do you allow him the game time to do so? It's too much of a risk.