The Board were caught between a rock and a hard place. The team has been struggling for some time,and relegation is a possibility,not a given,but it could happen.
So,what do they do? Sit back and let the boat sink,thereby incurring everyone's wrath?
Had that scenario played out they would have been vilified by all and sundry for not taking positive action. A decision had to be made,and they have had the guts to take it. Laudrup has looked washed out and somewhat disinterested for some time,so his removal comes as no surprise to me. West Ham was the final straw. The Board had to act.
We all love Michael Laudrup,and having him linked to our team will be talked about for a very long time. However,all good things must come to an end,and I'm sure he is well aware of this. In a few months time we will know if the Board have made the correct decision,but at least they did make one,and for the right reasons.
The players' now need to get their act together and ensure Premier League football at The Liberty next season.
They could have got behind ML and shown more support to him. This all seems to have festered from the Agent nonsense at the start of the season and appears to have been personal.
ML has been made the Fall Guy, but as a matter of principle I think the Board should place Huw on gardening duty for the rest of the season - in order for HIM to learn from this and see how it could have been handled in a more professional way. Our policy during the transfer window could come back to bite us.

