He offers something different, so I think he'd be worth a go on a half season loan. If this happens, it'll be the end of Danny Graham at Hull City.
He's talking with us tomorrow. He's talking to about half a dozen clubs. Won't be silly money regarding fee. He's only got 6 months left but silly money will win the days on wages I would have thought. We've got a wage structure and won't be breaking the bank to pay an unproven player silly wages.
With the other clubs that are interested I don't think we stand a chance of signing him, saying that I don't think we actually need him.
We definitely won't sign Ince. And I doubt we will find a way to get rid of Danny Graham either, unfortunately.
According to the Fail, we can only sign him on loan if a permanent is agreed for the summer. Two possibilities - a) get rid of Graham and loan Ince; or b) be held to ransome for a fat (permanent) fee. http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/Hull...-29-Tom-Ince/story-20519912-detail/story.html
Speaking after Tuesday's 1-0 Premier League defeat at Crystal Palace, Hull manager Steve Bruce insisted he was not planning a move for the former Liverpool youngster. "There's nothing in that and we're not likely to do anything before Friday," Bruce told BBC Radio Humberside.
But you often get told 1 thing, and get shown another. Bruce isn't going to let anyone know what he is doing up front
After Jelavic and Long, can't see him bringing in another striker. Anyways, Ince is predominantly a winger but also has potential to play in the hole behind the main striker. Apparently it's between Hull, Stoke, Sunderland and Swansea. I would probably say Swansea will be in pole position for him.
That story doing the rounds on twitter in the last few mins seems to be based on Bruce's comments last night, whereas Sky, the BBC and Buckingham seem to think there's something in it. TWT, unless time stops, and then it won't tell.
