Cold blooded murder and nobody else would have got off with it. His job has saved him serving a life sentence for gunning down an unarmed man.

Or would the detractors prefer another dead cop?
x
Why? It's true. Police aren't supposed to be above the law so shooting an unarmed man is against the laws of this country. Considering the Police preach about living within the laws of the land and with us living in a democratic society, the full weight of the law should be thrown against this particular copper.
It doesn't matter wether he was a criminal or not, that's still no reason to shoot an unarmed man.
Posting the opposite to sensible doesn't always make you controversial ......... you tried a bit too hard there.

Honestly don't know what you mean by trying to be controversial? I'm speaking my mind, obviously nobody on here agrees with me but that's fine. I would rather be true to myself than an out and out liar, like yourself![]()
It's not the fact that you're speaking your mind, it's that you're wrong on both counts.
"Cold blooded murder and nobody else would have got off with it."
It wasn't cold blooded murder.
"His job has saved him serving a life sentence for gunning down an unarmed man."
He wasn't unarmed.
While I'm on, I have to correct you on another point ........ I've never lied on here and never will.


You must think people are stupid!
What was it again.... 'After the 0-3 at SJP, you walked out of the ground and through Newcastle and not one mag supporter said anything to you'. Hahahahaha, suuuuuuuuuuure that happened![]()
I'm 100% sure about everything I've ever posted on here and will always stand by it.
I believe I was talking about the Gary Rowell 4-1 game when I was in the Newcastle seats or the play-off semi-final.
I was at the 3-0 and 5-1 though so you may be referring to one of those games.
By the way, I don't think everyone on here is stupid ............


It's ironic that these people boast about living outside of the law then want the law to act for them when it goes wrong.
They know everything about their rights but nothing about their responsibilities.
I know fella, don't mince my words myself. But they will close the thread.
I have to say I'm in agreement with most on here - the only logical verdict given what we know about Duggan
Oh dear, what a pity, never mind.
I can usually see both sides of an argument and find merit in both, even if I have a firm view in one way or another.
In the case of Mark Duggan I can't find a shred of sympathy despite the 29 year old having left 6 children without a father.
Watching the family, solicitor and various pompous and deliberately enraged 'spokespeople', ranting on behalf of 'justice' cuts no ice with me.
Justice was done, in my opinion, when a gun carrying 'gangster' criminal was prevented from carrying out another crime.
Not only does he deserve his fate it also serves as a warning to other people that there's a bigger gang, with better guns, out to get them.
Sorry for his kids but 'live by the sword, die by the sword' in my opinion.
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/lat...an-had-a-gun-but-was-lawfully-killed-jury-say
I agree to every word of that.
A dad to six should know better imo.
You must think people are stupid!
What was it again.... 'After the 0-3 at SJP, you walked out of the ground and through Newcastle and not one mag supporter said anything to you'. Hahahahaha, suuuuuuuuuuure that happened![]()
I have no objection of you or anyone else for that matter having a different outlook to myself, but this is just being silly...Why on earth would it be unrealistic to say that you didn't get attacked?

A six shooter with a six shooter eh?