No. We should play the strongest XI against Burnley.
Only a fool would do that.
No. We should play the strongest XI against Burnley.
Only a fool would do that.
We don't need our strongest XI to beat Burnley. Also I reject the concept of a strongest XI.
Because of the injury risk, right.
How many players got injured during our League Cup run?
We don't need our strongest XI to beat Burnley. Also I reject the concept of a strongest XI.
Suspensions. Bookings. Four games in 10 days. We already have a lot if injuries. Game time for the fringe players.
I could go on, but for me, it's not worth the risk when we should be able to beat Burnley with some of the players who haven't played a lot in the last three games.
So what? Why take the chance? Also, your second sentence makes no sense.
If MoPo asked for volunteers, how many of the first teamers would put their hands up and say pick me?
. And on my second sentence: a team ideally has different players for different situations, and they are all ideally good enough to be called upon to do their job. We don't have eleven players who are clearly the best eleven for every game, and then 14+ others who are just stand-ins.
The same players who almost fumbled it into the ****ter against Bristol City? Great idea.
By the way, almost is not the same as did.
No. We should play the strongest XI against Burnley.