Morning Fellas

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
****ing hell I need a beer reading through all this saga ... anyone up for a pint ?

ACS stated in his opening post he doesn't apologise (imho thats the very first thing he should consider if he ever wished to reconcile his actions)

ACS is generally on here 24/7 I would safely assume his one the guest 'lurking' at the bottom of the page- he should have got the picture that he's not welcome by a quite a few posters on this board- and given some of the repugnant & unsavory comments he's made regarding posters deceased family members (thats a whole lot worse than any of what Billy posted on the weekends 'infamous removed thread' ) wouldn't it be easier to just ban the twat from posting on the Sunderland Forum?

I know free speech was mentioned earlier in the thread (or threads) but maybe we should draw the line with him?
 
****ing hell I need a beer reading through all this saga ... anyone up for a pint ?

ACS stated in his opening post he doesn't apologise (imho thats the very first thing he should consider if he ever wished to reconcile his actions)

ACS is generally on here 24/7 I would safely assume his one the guest 'lurking' at the bottom of the page- he should have got the picture that he's not welcome by a quite a few posters on this board- and given some of the repugnant & unsavory comments he's made regarding posters deceased family members (thats a whole lot worse than any of what Billy posted on the weekends 'infamous removed thread' ) wouldn't it be easier to just ban the twat from posting on the Sunderland Forum?

I know free speech was mentioned earlier in the thread (or threads) but maybe we should draw the line with him?

I'm gagging mate but our last Stella went at 8.13pm this evening <doh>
 
****ing hell I need a beer reading through all this saga ... anyone up for a pint ?

ACS stated in his opening post he doesn't apologise (imho thats the very first thing he should consider if he ever wished to reconcile his actions)

ACS is generally on here 24/7 I would safely assume his one the guest 'lurking' at the bottom of the page- he should have got the picture that he's not welcome by a quite a few posters on this board- and given some of the repugnant & unsavory comments he's made regarding posters deceased family members (thats a whole lot worse than any of what Billy posted on the weekends 'infamous removed thread' ) wouldn't it be easier to just ban the twat from posting on the Sunderland Forum?

I know free speech was mentioned earlier in the thread (or threads) but maybe we should draw the line with him?

I think its pretty clear that any posts he makes on here for a while are gonna be met with dogs abuse, 1 month ban request to be put in unless anybody strongly disagrees in the next 10 minute, as far as i'm concerned you orrible lot dont want him here
 
I think its pretty clear that any posts he makes on here for a while are gonna be met with dogs abuse, 1 month ban request to be put in unless anybody strongly disagrees in the next 10 minute, as far as i'm concerned you orrible lot dont want him here

No ****ing bans FFS!

Jesus this isn't real life, it's a footy forum.
 
**** you!
:p
I hope that was a mistype mate, as if there's one thing I do know the internet is not real life.
Otherwise I would be dead from all the threats of violence I receive.

The only person who could have been upset about Billy's post was Posh.
She was blissfully unaware of it until dragged over here with Brb, by ACS.
Brb then pulled out his scattergun and proceeded to wipe out any opposition to his rule of law.
<laugh> Genuine typo.
Anyway I think the main problem is BRB although he is obviously not solely to blame. Agreeing with a post / backing a poster should never get you a ban.
Your board wasn't ruled by an Iron Fist you'd all see how liberal this site actually is. It's like north korea on your board. The Mag board does not represent the philosophy of this forum and as you only visit this and your own board it's understandable you have come to your conclusion on a mods job. ACS and his cronies love keep you lot suppressed. I urge you to break free ;)
I don't post on NUFC forum anyway so it doesn't bother me mate haha. Was an OT thread that brought me here and I've hung around a little.

Durham Stag is a ****** who posts ludicrous ****e just to wind people up ....... if he disagrees I'll post an example every time he comes back on here.
No complaints from me pal, think what you like <cheers>
 
<<<<<< Has been to Morrisons today to top up supplies and has removed food from the fridge to fit in more John Smiths.
Food is for pansies.

On the topic of booze MR... You're a bit single malt fan aren't you?

I tried the English Whiskey Companies chapter 6 the other night... Beautiful drop. Worth a go regardless of the fact it's only aged three years and quite pricey.
 
<laugh> Genuine typo.
Anyway I think the main problem is BRB although he is obviously not solely to blame. Agreeing with a post / backing a poster should never get you a ban.

I don't post on NUFC forum anyway so it doesn't bother me mate haha. Was an OT thread that brought me here and I've hung around a little.


No complaints from me pal, think what you like <cheers>

Hang on, weren't you the soft knacker defending the horse clouter <laugh>