There is no way, on this planet, that Vettel has suddenly got an extra second a lap in his pocket through him being a brilliant driver. He is, of course, but that doesn't make any sort of logical sense as an explanation. The difference between the break and after is genuinely astounding. So, if we discount Vettel's talent incomprehensibly rising in a greater than exponential way, we MUST look at the car and it's components.
The interesting questions for me are;
- whether the technological advancement is legal, as is the point of the thread... I'd say it's 50-50, given Red Bull's past. Remember them using illegal maps etc for half a season, and the FIA not taking points from them.
- whether Webber has been given identical equipment. Judging by performances, it doesn't immediately strike me that he's had dramatic improvement, though he is on pole for tomorrow.
- if he hasn't got the same equipment, why not? I think his inevitable autobiography will be interesting.
- if they have identical equipment, it is possible that the new technology has been designed to enhance Vettel's attributes. If that is the case, could we see teams try to determine a specific characteristic they wish to enhance in future drivers because it will lead to the quickest race-cars?
- if the most interesting thing about this season is the conspiracy theories, why should we bother to even turn on the TV for the next races? Let's be honest. It's a borathon now. I know that sort of terminology splits camps, between "traditionalists" (you aren't traditionalists, you're just older... congrats on being born first) who recite the "listen ere sonny... back in my day we used to watch cars go round in procession every lap, knowing who the winner'd be, and we were just happy listening to the cars making beautiful harmony! That was before WW2 o'course, when I had a ration book and met this girl, Freda, I think she was called, she had a bonnet and pretty hair, and I met her on the way to the dentist with old Bill. Now Bill was a wrong-un if ever I saw one... etc etc" mantra (YAWN) of incoming death, and the new breed of fan who watches sport for excitement. WOW. Can you imagine the shock on the old codger's faces now... We must be TERRIBLE FANS to want to see something that's in anyway interesting or captivating. Shame you aren't saying that when you need our assistance to go for s***
F1 is boring when one man wins all the races for seasons upon seasons, so stop being cowards and admit it.
The standard response to the latter'll be "piss off then and don't watch it"... Quite simple really, I won't. And others won't either, until it's just the old codgers sitting in deck chairs who watch, the sport loses TV and money, and you're back to grumbling between yourselves about the good old days
The interesting questions for me are;
- whether the technological advancement is legal, as is the point of the thread... I'd say it's 50-50, given Red Bull's past. Remember them using illegal maps etc for half a season, and the FIA not taking points from them.
- whether Webber has been given identical equipment. Judging by performances, it doesn't immediately strike me that he's had dramatic improvement, though he is on pole for tomorrow.
- if he hasn't got the same equipment, why not? I think his inevitable autobiography will be interesting.
- if they have identical equipment, it is possible that the new technology has been designed to enhance Vettel's attributes. If that is the case, could we see teams try to determine a specific characteristic they wish to enhance in future drivers because it will lead to the quickest race-cars?
- if the most interesting thing about this season is the conspiracy theories, why should we bother to even turn on the TV for the next races? Let's be honest. It's a borathon now. I know that sort of terminology splits camps, between "traditionalists" (you aren't traditionalists, you're just older... congrats on being born first) who recite the "listen ere sonny... back in my day we used to watch cars go round in procession every lap, knowing who the winner'd be, and we were just happy listening to the cars making beautiful harmony! That was before WW2 o'course, when I had a ration book and met this girl, Freda, I think she was called, she had a bonnet and pretty hair, and I met her on the way to the dentist with old Bill. Now Bill was a wrong-un if ever I saw one... etc etc" mantra (YAWN) of incoming death, and the new breed of fan who watches sport for excitement. WOW. Can you imagine the shock on the old codger's faces now... We must be TERRIBLE FANS to want to see something that's in anyway interesting or captivating. Shame you aren't saying that when you need our assistance to go for s***
F1 is boring when one man wins all the races for seasons upon seasons, so stop being cowards and admit it. The standard response to the latter'll be "piss off then and don't watch it"... Quite simple really, I won't. And others won't either, until it's just the old codgers sitting in deck chairs who watch, the sport loses TV and money, and you're back to grumbling between yourselves about the good old days


