And you think allowing these workers to leave these jobs is really going to tackle the problem? What happens if a hundred workers up sticks one day and leave? The construction company brings in a hundred other poor mugs into exactly the same situation and nothing changes. It becomes a conveyor belt of human rights abuse.
My point is that without all the other human rights abuses (working hours, living conditions etc.), these workers wouldn't give a rats arse that they didn't have their passport, as they'd be content in their job, and making money to send back to their families. They agreed to move to Qatar to do a specific job where various promises were made, the problem is these promises haven't been kept. If they had been kept, there would be no reason to want to leave.
Wages, working hours and living standards - These are the things that need to be tackled to make a real change, obviously in an ideal world these workers would also have their passports, but I don't see it as top of the agenda, it's treating the symptoms of abuse rather than the cause.
Also I think it's a bit of a fantasy to think that these Nepalese labourers, with no language skills, little education etc, have a huge number of employment opportunities in Qatar, outside of construction, where these malpractices are pretty widespread across the industry.
P.S. No need for the aggressively patronising tone![]()
A lot of these workers aren't even getting paid. So why would anyone want to stay in those conditions and possibly go home in a casket to their wives? I'd rather go of my own free will but with no passport, you're ****ed.
[video=youtube;sALJPvu1GXw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sALJPvu1GXw[/video]
And you think allowing these workers to leave these jobs is really going to tackle the problem? What happens if a hundred workers up sticks one day and leave? The construction company brings in a hundred other poor mugs into exactly the same situation and nothing changes. It becomes a conveyor belt of human rights abuse.