So we have some people on here saying we are The Tigers at the same time as we are Hull City AFC and we should be able to market as The Tigers abroad but keep the name Hull City AFC - sorry if that is not accurate quotation but is more the jist of the argument. So do we really think that Mr Ashley would market his club abroad as The Geordies, or Mr Coates as The Potters (Stoke Potters does have a ring to it) - erm no, you have the market the club on the actual name that it is called. Brands have been rebranded in the past, look at Marathon and Opal Fruits.
Incidentally has anyone actually written to Papa expressing their concerns and opposition to the name change and got a reply?
So we have some people on here saying we are The Tigers at the same time as we are Hull City AFC and we should be able to market as The Tigers abroad but keep the name Hull City AFC - sorry if that is not accurate quotation but is more the jist of the argument. So do we really think that Mr Ashley would market his club abroad as The Geordies, or Mr Coates as The Potters (Stoke Potters does have a ring to it) - erm no, you have the market the club on the actual name that it is called. Brands have been rebranded in the past, look at Marathon and Opal Fruits.
Incidentally has anyone actually written to Papa expressing their concerns and opposition to the name change and got a reply?
the point about the chocolate bar was it was still a chocolate bar with whatever in it, it didn't stop being the same chocolate bar just because Mars rebranded it and even though you had some people whinging on about it they still brought it after the rebrand. and now we are used to snickers bars just like in 10 years time we will all be used to Hull Tigers - I seriously can't imagine that Papa and his advisers do not have a strong business case to put before the PL when the time for changing the name happens. And to those saying fan consultation not having taken place - precedence shows that fans are never thought about by the PL, Football League or FA, as MK Dons, Coventry, ticket pricing, the timing of this year's FA Cup final, Monday evening and sunday football just to suit Murdoch are just some of the numerous examples where fans don't count
This is exactly the same point that has been made many times, we are Hull City, we're also The Tigers, if anyone wants to market us outside the UK as The Tigers then they were free to do so, it required no name change. That's why most of us don't buy into the claims being made, or the rhetoric being used, it's a pointless change that's only going to alienate people.
Just another example of a sh**e topic on a sh**e thread 0n a forum that is also becoming sh**e
).
Good luck to all those involved in the campaign.
Say NO to Hull Tigers!
I will be supporting all those involved with CTWD.
If you are pro-name change or simply couldn't give toss, that is of course your perogative. Nobody is preaching at you. We are simply trying to inform those that are willing to listen and to try and raise media awareness.[/QUOTE
Welcome aboard Cott tiger, you'll soon get the hang of this place.]
My point was, that just because you're an expert in one business, it doesn't make you an expert in all businesses.
I don't believe Assem has any experience in the area of international branding, even his own companies logo and website are appalling. He sells his product because presumably it's a very good product, or he's cheaper than everyone else, he certainly doesn't do it on the back of his brand image.
Nobody's saying they have to defend one view or the other, simply pointing out the reality to someone asking for logical argument.
Plenty of views have been expressed contrary to that with no great issues, as is to be expected.
In argument, especially logical argument, the onus is ALWAYS on those making the positive assertion to prove their case. It forms the basis of our legal tradition, where the Crown has to prove guilt, or in theological debates where religious people have to prove God, not vice versa.
In this argument, the assertion being challenged is that the change WILL benefit the Club. I'm not saying it won't, I'm saying I want to see peoples argument as to how it will benefit us.
These were your words a few days ago.
Do you not regard them to pretty much contradict what you have just said?
No not really, unless you can see somewhere in that ^^^^ forcing people to stick to it on this board, it backs it up if anything.
I would say 'not really' doesn't cover it at all; there is certainly a clear intent to push the onus over to the naysayers to qualify their position - it is my opinion that everyone has that responsibility. Hey-ho, it's just an opinion.
