Beefy's Corner - The Off-Topic Chat Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
If it's Strongbow or Magners, it has to be cold enough to kill the taste. :)

I don't mind Magners. It's my drink of choice at St Mary's, because it's that, Carling, or some Saints Ale. That, and the price, is why I often try not to drink at the ground.

But yeah, Strongbow can suck a fat one, I've not had that since I was about 16.
 
If it's Strongbow or Magners, it has to be cold enough to kill the taste. :)

Ha..!, Yeah, I'd agree with that. I once asked for a Bulmers Ice but was told that the fridge had broken down. I said I'd rather have it warm anyway. In fact, it turned out to be utterly delightful and full of flavour at room temperature.
 
I don't mind Magners. It's my drink of choice at St Mary's, because it's that, Carling, or some Saints Ale. That, and the price, is why I often try not to drink at the ground.

But yeah, Strongbow can suck a fat one, I've not had that since I was about 16.

Ah I never drink at games. Once I'm in the ground, I don't buy anything. I'm not a huge cider fan at the best of times, but I like Aspall and a few others.

Learnt recently that Iron Maiden make their own ale, called Trooper, and you can buy it in Morrisons.
 
Depends what drink it is. Lager must be cold because it tastes poor at room temperature. Beer or Ale ought to be drunk at room temperature. If you keep it in the fridge, I hope you take them out well before you want to drink them. Unless you actually mean lager, of course.

No I mean ale; Adnams, Badger, etc.

Lager goes in the freezer.
 

IT MEANS IM NOT RICH AND DONT HAVE A PROSCHE OK

:sad::sad:

Rockstar have warned people not to buy cars. As there is a glitches that make garages eat them. (Basically making them disappear and not come back)

buy cars? I had no idea you could do this. Strange considering the name of the game. Anyway, this isn't GTA IV where you have to search high and low for the best cars; you only have to drive around Beverly Hills for 10 minutes andyou can find the Porshe, Tesla, Veyron, Lambourghini, etc.
 
IT MEANS IM NOT RICH AND DONT HAVE A PROSCHE OK

:sad::sad:



buy cars? I had no idea you could do this. Strange considering the name of the game. Anyway, this isn't GTA IV where you have to search high and low for the best cars; you only have to drive around Beverly Hills for 10 minutes andyou can find the Porshe, Tesla, Veyron, Lambourghini, etc.

Ment buy upgrades etc , there's no point as your car doesn't save.
 
Beefy:5404900 said:
IT MEANS IM NOT RICH AND DONT HAVE A PROSCHE OK

:sad::sad:



buy cars? I had no idea you could do this. Strange considering the name of the game. Anyway, this isn't GTA IV where you have to search high and low for the best cars; you only have to drive around Beverly Hills for 10 minutes andyou can find the Porshe, Tesla, Veyron, Lambourghini, etc.

Ment buy upgrades etc , there's no point as your car doesn't save.

Oh ok I'm with you. Any idea on when they'll sort a patch?
 
We had one of those WOW moments the other evening, when it was discovered that a US B-52 bomber had accidentally dropped two hydrogen bombs while breaking up in the air. Both armed themselves and one got within one low voltage switch of detonating. Obviously, both didn't, and fell to Earth relatively harmlessly.

In 1983, I remember being between jobs, and having a conversation where I was wondering whether it was worth looking for another, as the nuclear cold war situation had got to freezing point. The defence condition of the opposing powers had gone up a notch or two. Today I read this, and it doesn't surprise me. I think it happens more often than we think, but not under those conditions:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-24280831
 
Well, I guess that this changes the situation a bit. The doubters will continue to doubt. I have been in no doubt since about the mid-1990s, when I first saw proper data/evidence on the subject. What is it..? Global Warming or Climate Change if that's the term you prefer. There is no doubt it is happening. However, is it being assisted in it's rate and extremes..? Yes, it is now 95% certain that humans are assisting it. Again, it didn't take the evidence and report of now to realise that something was going on. The evidence has been clear from way back. Even in the 1960's there was enough evidence if one looked in the right direction.

Of course, there remains 5% of doubt. Let's all crowd around that 5% for comfort eh..? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-24292615
 
We had one of those WOW moments the other evening, when it was discovered that a US B-52 bomber had accidentally dropped two hydrogen bombs while breaking up in the air. Both armed themselves and one got within one low voltage switch of detonating. Obviously, both didn't, and fell to Earth relatively harmlessly.

In 1983, I remember being between jobs, and having a conversation where I was wondering whether it was worth looking for another, as the nuclear cold war situation had got to freezing point. The defence condition of the opposing powers had gone up a notch or two. Today I read this, and it doesn't surprise me. I think it happens more often than we think, but not under those conditions:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-24280831
Typical Russian built machines. :p
 
Well, I guess that this changes the situation a bit. The doubters will continue to doubt. I have been in no doubt since about the mid-1990s, when I first saw proper data/evidence on the subject. What is it..? Global Warming or Climate Change if that's the term you prefer. There is no doubt it is happening. However, is it being assisted in it's rate and extremes..? Yes, it is now 95% certain that humans are assisting it. Again, it didn't take the evidence and report of now to realise that something was going on. The evidence has beenclear from way back. Even in the 1960's there was enough evidence if one looked in the right direction.

Of course, there remains 5% of doubt. Let's all crowd around that 5% for comfort eh..? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-24292615

So it's not cows releasing methane or termites then, like they kept on saying for ages. <laugh>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.