Willian ??????

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
The rumour is that he's still deciding (according to some tweets from someone at Sky).

He'll go to Chelsea though. He went to AM for money despite having options to move to England and he'll do the same in this situation.

That`s what he said to spurs, maybe he is hoping United come in with an offer, Champions league and a better chance of starting games than with Chelsea.
 
You have strikers for that job!

I was replying to the comment that 'he can score a goal too' - technically correct but the implication is that he's a midfielder who scores lots of goals (someone like Lampard etc. or Van der Vaart when he was at Spurs).

Willian deals in assists - gets 15+ most seasons. So if you have a potent striker on the end of his crosses then he's justifying his fee - rather than signing him for his goals directly.
 
That`s what he said to spurs, maybe he is hoping United come in with an offer, Champions league and a better chance of starting games than with Chelsea.

1.Phil Edwards Sky ‏@philedwardssky 23 Aug
Have spoken to #willian in his London hotel. He claims he's still deciding which club to join. Agent also here.
from Westminster, London

Tweeted yesterday.
 
I was replying to the comment that 'he can score a goal too' - technically correct but the implication is that he's a midfielder who scores lots of goals (someone like Lampard etc. or Van der Vaart when he was at Spurs).

Willian deals in assists - gets 15+ most seasons. So if you have a potent striker on the end of his crosses then he's justifying his fee - rather than signing him for his goals directly.

Fair enough mate :emoticon-0148-yes:
 
I was replying to the comment that 'he can score a goal too' - technically correct but the implication is that he's a midfielder who scores lots of goals (someone like Lampard etc. or Van der Vaart when he was at Spurs).

Willian deals in assists - gets 15+ most seasons. So if you have a potent striker on the end of his crosses then he's justifying his fee - rather than signing him for his goals directly.
Didn't mean he scores lots of goals just that he has goals in him. If I was talking about Lamps then I would have said goalscoring midfielder. See your point though.
 
1.Phil Edwards Sky ‏@philedwardssky 23 Aug
Have spoken to #willian in his London hotel. He claims he's still deciding which club to join. Agent also here.
from Westminster, London

Tweeted yesterday.

Twitter is like having medicals before a contract is signed....pointless and wrong
 
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images




Crying at the Willian Wall
You must log in or register to see images


:cheesy::cheesy:
 
Apparently odds on Mata to Arsenal have dropped down to 2:1.

On it's own, means nothing - just some large money lumped on. As long as it's not Stan Kroenke putting the bet on, we should be ok.


Joking aside, whilst any team would want Mata in it (apart from us at the moment it seems), he's not really the player they need. Surely they are after a more "steely" type?
 
Apparently odds on Mata to Arsenal have dropped down to 2:1.

On it's own, means nothing - just some large money lumped on. As long as it's not Stan Kroenke putting the bet on, we should be ok.


Joking aside, whilst any team would want Mata in it (apart from us at the moment it seems), he's not really the player they need. Surely they are after a more "steely" type?

Essentially another (albeit better) Carzola. They'd be better off sticking that dough on Fellaini.
 
Apparently odds on Mata to Arsenal have dropped down to 2:1.

On it's own, means nothing - just some large money lumped on. As long as it's not Stan Kroenke putting the bet on, we should be ok.


Joking aside, whilst any team would want Mata in it (apart from us at the moment it seems), he's not really the player they need. Surely they are after a more "steely" type?

To get punters to lay heavy on a deal that will never happen. More profits = everybody is a winner bar the mug who bets on it.
 
I'd rather we went for Lamela than Willian tbh but fairly happy if we sell Moses.
 
I'd rather we went for Lamela than Willian tbh but fairly happy if we sell Moses.

I wouldn't. If Lamela came then there'd be no place for Mata in the side. I still think Oscar/De Bruyne can be dropped deeper and there's a place for all of all three of Willian, Hazard and Mata in the side, what then happens to MVG I'm unsure.
 
I wouldn't. If Lamela came then there'd be no place for Mata in the side. I still think Oscar/De Bruyne can be dropped deeper and there's a place for all of all three of Willian, Hazard and Mata in the side, what then happens to MVG I'm unsure.

Thought Lamela was a right winger? I'd have thought Willian was more Mata's mould!