This is what I mean; just because Squillaci came on the field, it does not mean he will prone to an inexorable mistake.
Squillaci didn't have his greatest ever game - not by a long shot, and I do not even like him, so if I thought he did something vitally wrong, I'd be the first to condemn him - but tell me, what did he actually do wrong in Newcastle's ''miraculous'' four goal comeback?
First goal - Koscielny put his legs through Best's and tripped him up, whilst his hands was all over him. Blatant penalty.
Second goal - deplorable defending by Clichy. Did not clear the ball at all when he jumped for it and Best was quick to pounce on Clichy's schoolboy error.
Third goal - terrible decision by the referee. Williamson made a meal out of being ''sandwiched'' between Rosicky and Koscielny, even though there was virtually no contact made, which was enough to bring him down.
Fourth goal - we did not clear properly, and it was a belter from Tiote.
Care to explain what role Squillaci had in any of those goals? The most common name was Koscielny...
The first one was very obvious. We really can have no complaints. Koscielny panicked and his inexperience was exposed; Best was going nowhere and he tripped him up.
The second penalty was a disgraceful decision and it was shocking how Williamson sneakily deceived the referee by making it look like he was pushed. Also, there are times when the referees can be pressurised by the home crowd into making a decision. These are called ''Home penalties''. And that's exactly what happened.