So what has it been now? First insults, then a condescending stance, and now some guy's got an issue with my grammar?
Sorry i think i must have missed something as i can't for the life of me figure out what a list of released Arsenal players has to do with whether Liverpool and Arsenal are likely to end up in a court case and how that would effect there respective reputations...
Plenty of other teams have managed to negotiate with them, so it does seem to work. Ask yourself, has your team ever successfully managed to broker a deal for a big name player? It seems to me, you miss out on a awful lot of those, I wonder why?
I don't think we have missed out on an aweful lot of big name signings to be fair. As i don't think we have gone in for many big names over recent years!
Really not into this **** right now, if you don't like the liverpool stance on the liverpool board, then bounce. simple as that.
He does love going off in a tangent, doesn't he? Why do you even address him? He's a good guy. Means well. But he's a little inflicted.
It's actually the list of signed Arsenal players too, but you can be forgiven for missing that A court case means no Suarez. No Suarez means no signings. No signings means no hope of competing. Suarez might get us into the top 4 next season without playing a single game for us
I know what it is as its been posted on the Arsenal board previously It really doesn't have anything to do with the current discussion though, it's lovely of you to get involved but i won't be biting today
chatting is fine, but you have to realize we are on the defensive with all of this, so expect a bit back. I have much more time on my hands tonight than you lot do, remember that. For us as well, try to keep it clean. At the end of the day, Suarez is the **** and if he wants to take his baggage and he wants to go for the arbitration than so be it. We have to stand strong and this time stand against the ****. EDIT: 8:51 here, and now to watch some Everton vs Galaxy, sweet!
Really? How so? You didn't come close to the top 4 with Suarez in your side last year. And we didn't have Suarez last year either. So how are you going to finish ahead of us with him being in our side (assuming a deal is struck out)? Do you just type?
'So what has it been now'??? Come again? Well, yes since everything on ze internet forum is written I would say grammar and being able to construct intelligible sentences, nay single clauses, is a fairly important aspect of posting comments on an internet forum.
When we first got wind the story would break i did ask on the Arsenal board for others to be nice if they where heading over here It's good for a bit of a laugh or a bit of debating but i'm not here to piss people off
We did look strong towards the end of the season with Sturridge off the last defender, Coutinho in the pocket, and Hendo providing tons of energy and directness to our attack. The problem is Sturridge, can he be healthy a full season and not keep having half seasons? time will tell. Aspas will help and think Sterling and Ibe will have possible breakout seasons ( full seasons_) .
Of course there is wumming, it is expected, it is when it goes into the name calling, mud slinging, nah nah nah, he said, she said, woes-me ****. Not letting that happen tonight. I have a very boring Everton x Valencia game to watch so I can have some ammo for Tobes in the morning.
Not at all. Issue 1)I've openly admitted that I can't find the basis for our fine. I stated that it is a very similar case but that it needed the judgement to see the evidence benchmark the FA required to convict other than presented so far. The warning that the FA's requirement appears to be not "beyond doubt" was only half in jest and should be a mild worry to you but then if the fine is in the thousands even if presented it'll not hurt you that much. Issue 2) As various people have stated its common practice for NDC to be part of all working life and while not impossible it would be highly irregular if there wasn't one now in a multi million pound deal that would rely on that very clause to maximise profit for the selling party. Most logical it's there so logic follows its been breached. Only two parties can breach it and its obviously not in one parties interest to do so. The third party appears to have hit it exactly and will benefit most from doing so. Coincidence? Possibly. Issue 3) Suarez version of events: he states there clear proof, it's in his interest to show it and he states in that interview it's not his job to make LFC more money. So why all the talk? Just do what needs to be done and get out if he's right. Now in my humble opinion those views above are not other wordly or grossly optimistic expectations. In fact id say it would be very strange to believe the opposite. The facts as known so far just don't fit reasonably with Suarez or Arsenals stories and I'm perplexed that we keep hearing the proof is out there but there's no drive to do the least painful thing and got to court and present. Just more trash talking, more accusations more bad feeling making negotiation or even amicable mediation less likely. Do you honestly think the alternatives you've put forward to our queries are the most likely version of events? Really? Or does it just suit your purposes in both hoping to get a player and hoping your club didn't get caught with their hand in the till? We'll see if Suarez actually walks the walk or just keeps flapping his lips . To be honest, you getting caught it not or even being innocent & lucky just isn't the biggest issue here.
