Bale on his way

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
We already know how to bury Spuds pal, we have been doing it for over 25 years. <laugh><laugh>

That proves my point about ignorance. If you'd said 17 years you'd be exactly right, but you have not even been in the top division for 25 years, yet alone burying us. You were only in the top ten for one of the first eight of those 25.

Chelsea are a top club, but have only been one for a relatively short time. I don't really understand why you have to slag off other clubs who've been at the top much longer.
 
That proves my point about ignorance. If you'd said 17 years you'd be exactly right, but you have not even been in the top division for 25 years, yet alone burying us. You were only in the top ten for one of the first eight of those 25.

Chelsea are a top club, but have only been one for a relatively short time. I don't really understand why you have to slag off other clubs who've been at the top much longer.


A slight exaggeration but you got the point because you bit so readily like all you spuds do.

Here fishy, fishy! <laugh>
 
So you admit you are a WUM!

As I've said many times I am genuinely interested in Chelsea because my dad supported them. I even gave a bundle of his old Chelsea programmes to one of your posters. is it too much to ask that you simply take my posts at face value and try to educate me about Chelsea rather than this pointless wumming.
 
That proves my point about ignorance. If you'd said 17 years you'd be exactly right, but you have not even been in the top division for 25 years, yet alone burying us. You were only in the top ten for one of the first eight of those 25.

Chelsea are a top club, but have only been one for a relatively short time. I don't really understand why you have to slag off other clubs who've been at the top much longer.

We've owned you at 3PL since 87 and at the Bridge since 90. So 26 years of dominating you
 
That proves my point about ignorance. If you'd said 17 years you'd be exactly right, but you have not even been in the top division for 25 years, yet alone burying us. You were only in the top ten for one of the first eight of those 25.

Chelsea are a top club, but have only been one for a relatively short time. I don't really understand why you have to slag off other clubs who've been at the top much longer.

In fairness he hasn't done that on this thread.
 
We've owned you at 3PL since 87 and at the Bridge since 90. So 26 years of dominating you

Possibly 17 again - you can't really count a season when you didn't play us because you'd been relegated. And the last seven seasons your league record at WHL is W1 D3 L3 which is an odd definition of 'owning'
 
So you admit you are a WUM!

As I've said many times I am genuinely interested in Chelsea because my dad supported them. I even gave a bundle of his old Chelsea programmes to one of your posters. is it too much to ask that you simply take my posts at face value and try to educate me about Chelsea rather than this pointless wumming.

Where does he state he was a wum? I think you are revving up to be the new Hiag aren't you wum!
 
We've owned you at 3PL since 87 and at the Bridge since 90. So 26 years of dominating you

Not only do I remember watching and enjoying that LECW I'm with you on 100% on that one mate. These Spuds can't count can they<ok>

They have won virally naff all for 52 years yet want kudos for the achievements that his granddad remembers <laugh><laugh>
 
<doh>
Oh, sweet Lord, DL!

It's bad enough that you post a link to a Fail Online so-called "article," but one written by an infamous Talk5hite wum! You really are scraping the bottom of the barrel with this one, mate.

Durham hates Spurs, as anyone who has listened to that twat's radio programs and rants will readily have observed. He is about as biased as one can imagine in a journo, and his style is sensationalism at its gutter-snipe worst.

Where in that article does Durham report on any actual quotes from Bale or Levy? I'll save you the effort by answering that one for you - nowhere.

Where in that article is there any attempt at analysis as to (a) whether or not Real can actually afford to buy Bale (bearing in mind they still owe us £12.5m for Modric), (b) the fact that British players have all failed miserably abroad, (c) the emotional burden and stress that Bale will have to carry if he is to live up to the reputation of being the world's most expensive player at a club like Real?

I'll save you the effort of going back and looking - nowhere.

That trashy article is nothing more than an anti-Spurs rant, full of spite and ignorance. As such, the wums on this board will absolutely love it.

According to Ancelotti, Talksport are correct. Real are in advanced talks to buy Bale

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23526530
 
Looks like HIAG has said this a few times, with the misspelling of principle.

On his mouser thread: "As a matter of principal, now, Levy won't sell Bale to Real; he'll end up going to £ity for £100m, next season."