I agree Bale may will be held prisoner another year. But you've changed your tune: earlier on this year you said Bale would stay for THREE more seasons. Cliff jones told you
HIAG backtracking ? Never According to the Sun, Bale has told the Spiv Levy that he's broken his promises about listening to offers for him if they failed to reach the Champions League and that he wants out to join Real Madrid http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...lls-Tottenham-I-want-to-join-Real-Madrid.html Sound familiar ? Of course it does, the Spiv Levy held Modric hostage and broke promises to him too about exactly the same issue, and we all know how that one ended up. Free Gareth Bale
THey are just recycling Modric stories. He's also been saying how he's looking forward to working with AVB this year. Someone is lying.
More stories in the Guardian now. http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2013/jul/27/gareth-bale-wants-to-play-madrid Would you call the Guardian a ' wum's charter ' ?
FFS they are reporting the Marca story (as stated at the top of their "story"), and Marca is a wum rag doing the bidding of Real.
Transfer Rumour Table Paper - Right/Total (Accuracy) The Guardian 221/647 (34.2) Daily Record 191/561 (34%) The Scotsman 8/28 (28.6%) The Independent 180/631 (28.5%) The Herald 23/81 (28.4%) The Times 327/1199 (27.3%) Daily Telegraph 176/655 (26.9%) The Express 363/1457 (24.9%) The Sun 862/3899 (22.1%) Daily Star 507/2330 (21.8%) Daily Mirror 1538/7255 (21.2%) Daily Mail 921/4397 (20.9%) News Of The World 286/1697 (16.9%) The People 131/893 (14.7%) Metro 83 717 11.6% You do take pleasure in making a Tool of yourself don't you.
Check another Guardian story out as provided by DL http://m.guardian.co.uk/football/2013/jul/27/gareth-bale-real-madrid-tottenham-hotspur?CMP=twt_gu
If you knew anything about journalism you'd know that newspapers get the majority of their stories from central agencies such as Reuters. It's hardly surprising that the exact same story is being reported in numerous rags. You can tell the same lie a hundred times, PESKIE, but that doesn't stop it being a lie.
You said the Guardian was a 'wum rag' yet it's the paper that gets the most transfer stories correct. How does that correlate HAIG ?
No quotes, sounds like guesswork to me. However £86m is some offer and, if true, then we could improve the team enormously with that amount of money. I am calm about either scenario. If we spend £80m replacing him, will we be subjected to posts from you saying what big spenders we are?
