In 'allo 'allo ' they say this only once but I will say this for the 3rd time. I have no doubt that Hughton and McNally know what they are doing but I raise the point now, as on previous windows, at the people saying buy this, buy that, buy the other when we already have 26 players for the 25 man squad especially as it is often the same people who are reluctant to see players leave. To be fair to all sides of the arguement I would point out that on this thread alone there are people who would sell Fox, others who would keep him and others who want him in the starting eleven. Munky and Supers are perfectly correct when they say I bring this up every time so I will bring up another point I also raise at the same time - the loan system. It is perfect for the likes of Rudd or to get games for somebody returning from a long injury layoff but apart from that - no! What benefit did we get from sending Chris Martin etc out on loan? None. If Ch buys two more then just select 2 to sell, Don't even talk about loaning out the likes of Fox or Surman - sell 'em whilst they are still under contract. Ward was the odd man out last year. He hung around with us paying his wages for most of the season before he went out on loan and then ran down his contract.
elliott ward was on our payroll for two months of last season. the only reason he didn't leave beforehand was because a club didn't come in for him throughout the summer. that could (and does) happen with any club, any player, any summer so isn't relevant at all. i can only guess but chris martin was probably put out on loan to run his contract down away from the club (wages covered) and put him in the shop window for a move this summer (which worked although we were never going to get anything for him).
i totally get that you want people to realise that if we keep buying we need to address an overload of players aged over 21 but again, you seem to be looking for problems which don't really exist or at best, aren't major issues for the club


