Even if we sign a couple of players, we're still a long way from winning the league.
Depends who those players are...
Even if we sign a couple of players, we're still a long way from winning the league.
Even if we sign a couple of players, we're still a long way from winning the league.
Jack can play that role and do it even better than Ramsey does, as he showed in his debut season.
And last season he was poor in that role. He's not a CM anymore he's a CAM now.
And he wasn't great as a CAM either.
Even if we sign a couple of players, we're still a long way from winning the league.
I keep hearing this, but I'm curious as to which team we are so far behind. We were only 2 points behind Chelsea and 5 behind City, so United then?
What does changing managers have to do with anything? You do it every season and it ends up with you winning something, rather than disrupting your season. If anything, relative stability seems to have an adverse effect on Chelsea. The truth is with Torres and Ba up front you won't be winning the league title and the top strikers you keep getting linked with are starting to run out.
We played 69 games and changed managers. With relative stability we should get 10 more points this season.
When was the last time Arsenal looked like getting 80 plus points and challenging united: 07/8? It is now 2013/14.
I have never said we would win the league but I hope we at least Put in a decent challenge this season.
Of course, you will definitely put in a challenge with or without signings but I don't think Roman wants a challenge, he wants to win it. Will you accumulate 10 more points than last season? I strongly doubt it, not necessarily because I don't think you are good enough, more because with extra television money to midtable clubs, the quality of the league is only going to strengthen and points will be harder to come by.
Call me bias but I really believe our problems are easier to rectify than Chelsea and especially City, it's just a case of 1) can Wenger see them? and 2) will he fix them? That is all that is standing in the way of Arsenal and success, when it comes to Chelsea, although you guys win trophies for fun, I just get the impression there is something fundamentally wrong with the set up of your team. You have world class players, want to play exciting attacking football but can't control the tempo of a game, that is something that takes a lot more than 1 signing to change. Don't get me wrong, you can definitely compete for and win trophies but I just don't think you have the consistency to win a 38 match campaign.
Fair enough but Jose can change that balance very quickly back to counterattacking transition play.
If we tighten up at the back and the pivot I think 80-85 points is very achievable. If we get some quality strikers maybe 83-88.
Fair enough but Jose can change that balance very quickly back to counterattacking transition play.
If we tighten up at the back and the pivot I think 80-85 points is very achievable. If we get some quality strikers maybe 83-88.
That is the thing really, 3 of the top 4 clubs have new managers this season and I believe the manager that provides the biggest impact is the one that will end up champion at the end of the season.
You look at Arsenal, we already have our 'identity'. A conservative approach where our first aim is to retain possession and take less risks, wait for and punish errors, and then hurt teams with our pace.
That REALLY doesnt sound like Arsenal at all. We may be conservative in the transfer market but our football certainly is'nt. Conservative is one word I would'nt use to describe our style of play.
We push up with a dangerously high line - the main aim being to retain posession/or win the ball back high up the pitch. Move the ball around with pace and make the position chase us. That's the basic premise.