Rival Watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Sisu said:
So all the screaming about dodgy deals, not everyone, just man u supporters, was wrong, or as the truth would have it, you have gotten even dodgier deals in fact <laugh>

Short short memories indeed and I have not seen this board infested with City fans crying their eyes out over this as you lot were when City got theirs. Just a single example of how you lot like to twist things
Click to expand...

Yes of course. Cos a sponsorship deal from one of the world's largest car companies who make profits of $7.5 billion a year and have no connection to our owners is just as dodgy as a sponsorship deal from a small airline making annual losses who just happen to be owned by the same person who owns the club <doh>

Seriously, do you ever think before you post?
 
Swarbs said:
Yes of course. Cos a sponsorship deal from one of the world's largest car companies who make profits of $7.5 billion a year and have no connection to our owners is just as dodgy as a sponsorship deal from a small airline making annual losses who just happen to be owned by the same person who owns the club <doh>

Seriously, do you ever think before you post?
Click to expand...

More to the point, does he ever think at all ?
 
No One Famous said:
So City have paid 30million for a 28 year old who has played most of his professional football in the Ukrainian league and it's considered one of the signings of the summer.

Last summer United paid 24million for a 29 year old who had played most of his professional football in England and it was considered an expensive gamble.

That's why we're Champions.
Click to expand...

That's what I was thinking, and they are paying £10 mill more and is a "fantastic signing" where as RVP was all about "they are paying £24 mill for a 29 year old in the last year of his contract"
 
Swarbs said:
Not really. City already pay the highest wages by quite some way. All that will happen with the new TV deals is that Utd and Arsenal will be able to match their wage offers and Liverpool, Spurs etc will be closer.

It'll take away City and Chelsea's financial advantage, but their players won't be able to demand more money from City as there won't be competition for their squad players. After all, it's not like anyone will be queuing up to offer Tevez over £200k a week to play for another club <laugh>
Click to expand...

am not talking about now !! am referring to all new deals in a year or two .. once clubs have more money all new players will ask for more money, where do you think those extra TV moeny will go? it will not go to owners pockets or reducing ticket prices for the fans .. but all will go to player's and agent's pocket.. so City will have to stamp up bigger wages for any new players , and don't forget that in 1-2 seasons from now, when contract renewing time comes, most of the players with old contract will ask for big increase on their wages to match what other are getting
 
No One Famous:4847565 said:
So City have paid 30million for a 28 year old who has played most of his professional football in the Ukrainian league and it's considered one of the signings of the summer.

Last summer United paid 24million for a 29 year old who had played most of his professional football in England and it was considered an expensive gamble.

That's why we're Champions.
Click to expand...

And they're not.

Any chance this can be renamed the tedious FFP thread so Shwan can argue with Chelsea fans on his tod and the rest of us can just ignore it?

Cheers <ok>
 
Ruff said:
And they're not.
Any chance this can be renamed the tedious FFP thread so Shwan can argue with Chelsea fans on his tod and the rest of us can just ignore it?
Cheers <ok>
Click to expand...

tbh i just asked a QS of how City will meet FFP with all those new signings, it was chelsea fans who jumped on the QS and then argument started since
anyway FFP is one of the key subjects regarding one of our strongest rivals ..I find nothing is wrong if we decided to talk about it for 1-2 pages , more as there are little news around to enable us to move into another subjects
 
UEFA give Gill power to punish United's rivals... if they fall foul of financial fair play

Former Manchester United chief executive David Gill has been given power in his new role as an executive member of Uefa to recommend bans for club's that breach Financial Fair Play regulations.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...teds-rivals-like-Chelsea-Manchester-City.html
Click to expand...

hahaha First FA , now UEFA .. <laugh> let the conspiracy theories come in guys
Gill is a professional guy .. he will never be biased ... but i just can predict the headlines if City or Chelsea been banned by Gill <laugh>
 
Swarbs said:
Yes of course. Cos a sponsorship deal from one of the world's largest car companies who make profits of $7.5 billion a year and have no connection to our owners is just as dodgy as a sponsorship deal from a small airline making annual losses who just happen to be owned by the same person who owns the club <doh>

Seriously, do you ever think before you post?
Click to expand...


Yes I do, I think what ****in eejit will respond to this<ok>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back