My weak position of saying throughout that it was inevitable that Rangers would cease to operate as a club. I'd hate to see what you think is a strong position. Craigy Craigy Whyte with a mask and a bag marked swag. The fact of the matter is that you cautiously welcomed Whyte and hoped for a shift in attitude. The reason you hoped for a shift in attitude was because the debts were unsustainable. Now you want to tell us that they could be serviced? Murray tried for 4 years to get shot of that club. He ended up giving it away for a quid. If you are too thick to join the dots, then that is your problem. Not mine. I first knew Rangers were in huge difficulty in 2005. This was inevitable. In fact I am surprised they lasted as long as they did. Your answer to sell players in January 12 when they were forced into administration 2 weeks into February was a little late in the day Wedginald. Even a fiscal **** up like you must see that....maybe not.
The cretin had to leave just after 7pm. Must have been past his bedtime ... and given the crap, of which he's full, probably needed his nappy changed as well.
Remember when the bbc told the world Whyte was a crook , did the daft Huns not march to the bbc headquarters in protest ???
Maybe the BBC should do some more investigations. If Whyte was a crook what does that make the present incumbents of Sevco? "Whyte, who bought the club from Sir David Murray for £1 in May 2011, is taking action after an investigation found no evidence that he had invested in the current set-up" http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11781/8742472/Former-Rangers-owner-Craig-Whyte-threatens-legal-action-against-club
What reason did he give for saying 'no' - surely, if Dev is correct that the cretin is continuously giving negative rep to Celtic fans and positive to his cohorts, that is an abuse and action should be taken by the mod/s? Do you know why he was banned from the Liverpool board?
