Chazz, I think you are right mate. Maybe he did have a knock though. I agree that he is being a bit hyped up by some people anyway.No he said no Fathi or Koren who has a calf strain. So Fathi dropped Koren injured. You misheard.
Chazz, I think you are right mate. Maybe he did have a knock though. I agree that he is being a bit hyped up by some people anyway.No he said no Fathi or Koren who has a calf strain. So Fathi dropped Koren injured. You misheard.
Boyd should be nowhere near midfield, hes wasted there, and it leaves us a man short in the middle.
I think its time to look at 442, the last few weeks weve looked much better when weve brought Rosenior on than when weve played 352.
I've never said he was awful. I've always said Bruce doesnt rate him or he wouldn't play him. I think Bruce and his staff will ave looked at all options of where to play him, it's not happened for a reason. I've always pushed for TC to play, but he's not had a look in, again, I trust Bruce's judgement rather than my own.I don't get Chaz or the arguement saying Fathi is amazing. Can't we all just agree he is a half decent football, he is brilliant nor is he awful like Chaz says. Fathi for me is probably our best option, better than Alex Bruce who is a CB, and Evans who is average. It doesn't mean he is amazing but he is our best option in DM.
To blame him for the goal is silly, he lost possession on the half way line, there were 2 defenders behind him and the goalie. Stockdale could have done much better to make the save. He was probably our best player on Tuesday and probably showed enough to be played against the already relegated, bottom side. But SB played Boyd, who is an AM or striker, in CM. Earlier in the season he played Bruce, who is a CB. He wanted Boyd for the creativity, but didn't bet on Bristol crowding him out, or Boyd having probably his worst game in a City shirt.
I can't remember us having a good game when playing Meyler as our most defensive midfielder (perhaps there might have been one).
Meyler isn't particularly suited to that linking role. You need somebody who you know will be in the middle of the pitch to receive a pass and then move it on, keep possession in their half and then give it to the players who create chances. Evans does that role well, and Fathi seemed okay at Wolves.
jr is best in that role..
dare I say it... but we missed him.
Hello, anybody hear me? Fathi HAD A KNOCK THAT WAS WHY HE WAS ON THE BENCH chill out people
Big clanger.
Meant we had semi-fit attackers.
Meant team unbalanced as Elmo and Brady had no-one to play off as Meyler and Quinn sucked in too central.
Solution - back to 3-5-1-1 which is really what we usually play. Start Simmo against Barnsley. Start Fahti or Evans in central mid. Either play Boyd in the hole or drop him for Koren (or Fahti who has good shot on him and would do well there).
You know what, I haven't got a ****ing clue why Bruce (Snr) picked the team the way he did.
But his track record with us and other clubs suggests he gets the big calls right the majority of the time. Which manager doesn't get somethings wrong sometimes?
I tell you what though. In this day and age of sterile chess like football, it's refreshing to see a manager 'go for it'.
Better to try and fail than not try at all.
Bit like the way in which Brown (Phillip, he of pink jumper fame and brown brogues fame) had a go the first time we went to the Emirates.
Now get a grip and let the experts pick the team.