how I'm wrong !!! i told you give me any deal for a serious player like pique or Zaha who worth millions ... then admit I was wrong the only thing you proven is that among all Chelsea deals, you only was able to find one deal for players worth peanuts (not even worth a fight for) .. the fact you couldn't find any deal done in a proper manner involve millions, speaks loud on the manner Chelsea conduct their business.. find me a serious chelsea deal worth 5m+ and i will admit am wrong
It doesn't matter about the money... http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/may/10/portugese-police-manchester-united-bebe-transfer Manchester United's peculiar £7.5million transfer of misfit striker Bebe is being investigated by anti-corruption police in Portugal,
So in essence what you want is proof that a club put into writing that they were delighted about the sales process of a star player who was bought by another club who you personally consider to be a rival to Manchester United whilst bearing in mind that the transfer fee was of a level that you consider to be greater than the price of peanuts. That's my Sunday ****ed.
it dose darling .. no one will fight over peanuts again you failed to bring any serious deal .. what that tells you on Chelsea conduct on serious deals?
You're changing the original question to fit your own argument. No point even trying to reason with you...
hhh .. so you don't have any serious deal .. no wonder why you are going around the subject instead bring in a prove .. a serious deal.. what reason !!? if someone steal a 5P from you .. are you gonna do the same thing if someone take £5m ? bzc that is your argument .. and that what you are assuming people kill their brothers at times when disputing 5m .. now you bring 5P example and say.. "nahh they must love each other bcz he didn't make a deal out of it " who gonna make a problem for a deal worth peanuts? .. if you can't see the difference .. there is no point arguing with you darling
yepp me tool .. coming from the guy who compare Engalnd mid to spain and failed to bring a prove for the 2nd time here .. 1st time you run away like a coward when I asked you when i did used the exact word which you twisted I think you are "no one famous" for a reason
This looks a fun conversation boys. Hope you're enjoying, I can see he's got the darlings out but haven't seen any silly boys, probably because I can't be arsed to trawl through all the nonsensical backtracking, sanctimomy and contradictions. I'll leave you to it.
hhh and this is for Purley http://www.espn.co.uk/football/sport/story/156437.html yepp as you said .. it was clear example of how Chelsea do proper business hhh the problem i never seen any figure yet though .. we can arguing here about a free transfer !!
i said it above .. we are not perfect .. but at least we did some proper classy deal with respect to the other clubs meanwhile you said "NO .. Chelsea did that too" .. and you bring an example (with no fees attached to it) and Anderlecht's chairman criticizing Chelsea for their conduct as a prove of how good chelsea deal business !! .. seriously? go back to your working board and find a proper deal and then come back
That's okay than. We're a loud to do some dodgy deals every now and again because we do some 'proper classy' deals as well.
UTD are not Saints..we had our own shares of bad deals .. but at least we had some good deals were opposed clubs treated with respect, which overall rarely our rivals do
