Hazard shouldnt have been anywhere near him
Why not? Last I knew ball boys aren't instructed to dive on top of the ball when a player comes to get it.
Hazard shouldnt have been anywhere near him
Nothing harsh about the card he kicked the kid whether it hurt is not the point, dirty belgian ****
Why not? Last I knew ball boys aren't instructed to dive on top of the ball when a player comes to get it.
And it aint hazards job to get the ball to give it to the opposition thats what the ball boy is there for either way he just kicked a kid in the ribs dirty belgian ****
And it aint hazards job to get the ball to give it to the opposition thats what the ball boy is there for either way he just kicked a kid in the ribs dirty belgian ****
Its up to the referee to add time on for incidents like that - its not up to a player to take the law into his own hands - he deserved the red card simple as that!
i think thats the last time that ball boy should be a ball boy for you hes a cheating c**t he saw the chelsea player coming to get the ball so he picked it up and layed on it to waste time. i thought ball boys are supposed to give the ball back straight away not cheat and hold on it. thats how you time waste is it now. i don't feel any simperfy for that kid at all he should do his job properly also he did not need to do that as you where playing well and chelsea where rubbish.
hassard was trying to get the game going quicker as they was loseing i bet one of your players would do it if they where in the same position as chelsea
And it aint hazards job to get the ball to give it to the opposition thats what the ball boy is there for either way he just kicked a kid in the ribs dirty belgian ****