Why not? Last I knew ball boys aren't instructed to dive on top of the ball when a player comes to get it.
i think thats the last time that ball boy should be a ball boy for you hes a cheating c**t he saw the chelsea player coming to get the ball so he picked it up and layed on it to waste time. i thought ball boys are supposed to give the ball back straight away not cheat and hold on it. thats how you time waste is it now. i don't feel any simperfy for that kid at all he should do his job properly also he did not need to do that as you where playing well and chelsea where rubbish.
And it aint hazards job to get the ball to give it to the opposition thats what the ball boy is there for either way he just kicked a kid in the ribs dirty belgian ****
yes but he shouldn't have cheated by keeping the underneath him i have no simperfy for that kid he should not cheat by keeping the ball thats not his job.
Its up to the referee to add time on for incidents like that - its not up to a player to take the law into his own hands - he deserved the red card simple as that!
Did he ****. Ball boy's clearly learned a thing or two about play acting from the pros. Feel no sympathy for the little ****er, unlike Hazard.
Hazard kicked the boy in the ribs - bastard. Deserved what he got. Deserves to be suspended for a few.
hassard was trying to get the game going quicker as they was loseing i bet one of your players would do it if they where in the same position as chelsea
If you can justify a grown man kicking a kid in the ribs over a football it says as much about you as it does about hazard. dirty belgian ****
1. They don't though do they. 2. He's perfectly entitled to go to get the ball if the ball boy's wasting time. Was a stupid thing to do and was a red card by the letter of the law but feel nothing but sympathy for Hazard and none for the little twat. And I'm not exactly a Chelsea fan either.
Violent conduct against anybody at the game - crowd, officials, players, etc - is an automatic red card. He kicked the kid in the ribs. No need. Violent conduct - can't argue with the video.
hassard was trying to get the game going quicker as they was loseing i bet one of your players would do it if they where in the same position as chelsea even they said on sky the ball boy should not have layed on ball its wrong
Hazard's behaviour summed up the frustration in the whole Chelsea team - they didn't know what to do next and thats over the two legs
Ducking back in for a second to say I think it's pretty clear Hazard was clearly trying to kick the ball out from under the ball boy, not actually kick the ball boy. Still a ****ing stupid move though.
