http://leggoland2.blogspot.com/2011...html?showComment=1304939116861#c7700533531182 199928 At 9 May 2011 04:05 , Girvan Loyal é said... You certainly give it to us straight, big man, just like it says at the top of the page!! I'm a long time admirer of your work and love the way you get it right back up them. Spiersy will be choking on his weetabix!!!! The Thims are rhaging!!! It would be great if you said hello, Dave, just to let us know that you actually read our comments. It would mean the world to feel that we are actually all in this together. You're the very best - an example to the lickspittle "so-called journalists" out there. I could just about cry with gratitude sometimes!!! All the very best to you. Girvan Loyal é ----------------------------
Actually, someone was kind enough to rep me a link. Who knows who the anonymous poster is. By the way, do you fancy him? He's such a dreamy looking guy!
Bollo In essence, it's about one brainless, paranoid ****** agreeing with another brainless, paranoid ******. It's the way he does it in such a slimy, creepy way that really makes the skin crawl. "It would be great if you said hello, Dave, just to let us know that you actually read our comments. It would mean the world to feel that we are actually all in this together."
I just leave the likes of Leggat, Speirs and Phil Giocuntyflaps or whatever his name is to it. No doubt there's some truth to what they write but their clear obsession clouds their judgement and the facts most of the time. I dare say you take Speirsy and Phil's content more seriously than Leggats?
I don't read any of them mate. As I said, someone sent me the link to the Leggat and Girvan Loyal love-fest. No idea who it was.
None of them shoudl be taken seriously unless the have ahrd facts. But how do you know it was Girvan?
Leggat's blog is just fuel for the bigots. The comments on each article are testament to that. He's a ****ing moron who appears to have some weird obsession with Spiers. Or a talented wum; whichever, he's not to be taken seriously. I've never to my knowledge read any Phil McWhateverhisname is so can't really comment on him. Spiers might not get it right all the time and maybe he does concentrate on Rangers problems more than Celtic's. But why shouldn't he highlight the sectarian issue at Rangers? To compare him to Leggo is just plain ridiculous.
