Charlie Boy Says "Get Tae ****"

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Medro said:
Well I was waiting for that statement from the SFA to see if they had broken the rules but they haven't, yet.
Click to expand...

Looks who's crawled in at last.

No threads about Celtic on GC today? Or is it only worth it when we lose 2-1 to Barcelona in Spain?
 
DevAdvocate said:
Were you?
Click to expand...

Well that was going by your comment were you said the SFA had agreed not pay Rangers any money.

StereoTypist said:
Looks who's crawled in at last.

No threads about Celtic on GC today? Or is it only worth it when we lose 2-1 to Barcelona in Spain?
Click to expand...

Are you asking me a question?

DevAdvocate said:
Whit?

He said "They have broke rules"
Click to expand...

I did, after you said they had agreed not pay Rangers money.

Understand.

Of course, you were talking ****, so you can forget about the comments I made.
 
Medro, taking 'spastic' to a whole new level of spastic as per the blah blah blah blah
 
DevAdvocate said:
Just heard the SFA have confirmed Rangers are not entitled to a share of Gate receipts, Rangers to challenge it through the courts <laugh>
Click to expand...
Medro said:
If that is the truth and they have broke the rules then we'll see them in court.
Click to expand...

This of course was bullshit.

DevAdvocate said:
As far as i'm aware Utd have not broken any rules you ****ing dullard, that's why the SFA are siding with them <doh>
Click to expand...
Medro said:
No. Rule 41 states: "the visiting club shall have the right to claim admissions up to 20% of the spectator capacity of the ground". It is a right, not an obligation.

The visiting club is entitled to 37.5% of the gate. Rule 46©(1) requires 5% of the gate to be given to the SFA as a levy. Rule 46©(2) allows the home club to keep 20% of the gate. Rule 46©(3) splits the remainder equally between the clubs i.e. we get half of 75%.

Rule 46(e) requires the home club to pay our share to us on the day of the match (unless agreement is otherwise reached).

Can Dundee Hibs reduce the ticket price to, say, £1?

No. Rule 40 requires that the price is to be agreed between the clubs. In the absence of agreement "the charges which are normally made for the regular fixtures of the club" will apply. In any event, the price cannot be below £8. So if Green does not agree otherwise, Dundee Hibs will have to charge their normal prices (£20-£25?).
Click to expand...
 
Medro said:
Well that was going by your comment were you said the SFA had agreed not pay Rangers any money.



Are you asking me a question?



I did, after you said they had agreed not pay Rangers money.

Understand.

Of course, you were talking ****, so you can forget about the comments I made.
Click to expand...

No you said "they have broke rules" despite not getting any confirmation from anywhere, I think it's clear you are a plank.

If I told you aliens had landed from Mars would you have taken my word on that too?

Skelped laddy
 
DevAdvocate said:
No you said "they have broke rules" despite not getting any confirmation from anywhere, I think it's clear you are a plank.

If I told you aliens had landed from Mars would you have taken my word on that too?

Skelped laddy
Click to expand...

Yeah they would have broke the rules if your little tale was true.

But yeah well done on talking ****.

Go you. <doh>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back