I didn't say you couldn't abuse him and needed to perform oral sex on him mate. I just reckon if he's going to be slated it's for doing badly, not for where/how he grew up. It's Bruce all over again. Who gives a **** that he was a geordie, he was just ****e... NMG. Don't be NMG. One's enough.
Agreeing with someone makes me a parrot? Alright, **** it, kill the Republican ****, burn him at the stake, up the IRA! Or am I being a parrot to Billy now?
Aye, be quiet and no one will call you a parrot! I dare you. I like that as well. Poor, poor form Disco.
Exactley vince we dont want to be one of those clubs where managers have a average time in the job of 12 months they are never successful without hundered million pound squads
MON in. Could I ask, in reality how has getting rid of Bruce improved the situation, I couldn't see it then and I cannot see it now(other than a glimmer of hope a la Lawrie Mac), we have made little or no progress under MoN - some might say at least we removed the stench of Mag from SoL, but that is the only tangible difference (not one I subscribe to) It was the supporters who got rid of Bruce and those same supporters will get rid of MoN. But think, if I was a half decent manager would I want to come to a club where supporters are going to lose their nerve and start voicing doubts?(look at Blackburn saddled with Henning Berg, who would we realistically get next - Bracewell, Shearer, Holloway, Curbishley, Eriksson) Take Newcastle, they got Pardew in spite of what their supporters thought of him, Ashley had gumption to ignore their fans and go with his instincts(or Pardew's gambling debts) - the fans give him grudging respect now they are reaping the rewards. No, if Short thinks MoN is up to the job then he must ignore the fans and trust in his man - not buckle like he did with Bruce. And we as supporters must temper our opinions(perhaps think of what the options are, see above) so they are not interpreted as dissatisfaction with MoN or we will have to accept the consequences.
