One thing that I found surprising about Arsenal's trip to Norwich was that they flew up there.
Luton to Norwich. 14 minutes in the air!
Luton to Norwich. 14 minutes in the air!


GHoddle,for me when we talk about the best start the abstract side of things must be considered. For example we are sitting above Arsenal but we have a brand new coach whereas they have old established Arsene so maybe relatively speaking we've had a MUCH better start. I've always thought that a good finish is better than a good start and it's only over the course of a season that you can properly judge matters.
So for me Spain Chelsea have had a good start but will they maintain this sort of football or will they fade towards the end? They had ups and downs last season and could do so again.
Now I was a bit surprised that Everton only drew with Hoops yesterday but I hope they thrash Liverpool next week. I like meeting Everton at their best and it's my favourite fixture of the season.
Let's just hope we don't do a last season and fade towards the end. A good win against Saints is vital.
So for me Spain Chelsea have had a good start but will they maintain this sort of football or will they fade towards the end? They had ups and downs last season and could do so again.
Now I was a bit surprised that Everton only drew with Hoops yesterday but I hope they thrash Liverpool next week. I like meeting Everton at their best and it's my favourite fixture of the season.
Let's just hope we don't do a last season and fade towards the end. A good win against Saints is vital.
Arsenal have had a harder start as they've played 5 away games to our three. As I say, after 12 games when we've both played 6 at home and away then we can judge fairly who's had the best start.
I still think Arsenal can go to Old Trafford and win. If Spurs did so and in the manner they did there is no reason why Arsenal can't, especially given Arsenal's performance at Eastlands. Until United get Vidic and Smalling back and fit, they are there for the taking IMO. United's next 2 games are against Chelsea and Arsenal and I'd be surprised if they didn't lose at least one of those.
I think all Three of the London clubs (Chelsea, Spurs and Arsenal) have narrowed the gap on the Manchester clubs in terms of quality of First XI, only problem is the Manchester clubs have more depth than Arsenal or Spurs. City more than Chelsea as well.
November has seem really cracking fixtures on the cards at the top of the league.
United v Arsenal
City v Spurs
Arsenal v Spurs
Chelsea v City
Throw Spurs v West Ham and Chelsea v Liverpool in there and it's a great month
After 12 pl games will you guys have played 6 home and away, I know for us we will have played 5 home and 7 away. not sure about Arsenal and Chelsea
its their midfield which worries me especially if Wilshere is fit and raring to go and we alll know about Cazorla and Arteta, much of the build up will be about RVP against his former team but I dont see him having an outstanding game on the day he might get an assist though, Koscielny hasnt been in top form of late but Mertesacker has but he hasnt got a great deal of pace, so that seems to be where we could get the chances from, especially if Hernandez plays but dont see that happening.
Yes, I really don't understand all this who's got the best start nonsense. What does it matter? This is a marathon, not a sprint. Look how far we were ahead of The Goons last season, and look how it ended up! That's what The Goons will point to. And quite rightly. It's where you finish the race, not where you are after less than a quarter of it, that matters.
i can't see anything but a win for United.
I thought Chelsea fans would know from recent experience that a good start is abolutely no indicator whatsoever of where a team will finish. A good start is a good start- no more, no less.

judging from the Norwich game ,a lot of people are overestermating the goons ,i don't think they are that good,and there defence is just as dodgy as our's ,and they still don't have a proven goalscorer dispite buying plodolski and giroud
I see your point but I think it does. I've always been a believer in form at the beginning does matter. Winning breeds confidence, just ask QPR. They aren't really a bad team (individually) but they've got in a slump and can't get out of it. With Reading its different as they genuinely don't possess the quality.
Arsenal are already in a position whereby if they fail to beat United a week Saturday that's their title chances done and dusted for another year. You can chase one team that is 12/13 points ahead but realistically not 3.
QPR you'd imagine will lose to Arsenal and if so that leaves them with 3 points from 9 games with some tough away games at Sunderland, Stoke and United as well as some winnable games at home to Southampton, Reading and Villa. Even with 10 points from those games that's about 13 points nearly half way into the season. With tough home games coming up in the 2nd half of the season to the likes of City, United, Arsenal and even Newcastle you'd have to say their ambitions already can't extend beyond a 14th/15th place finish. West Ham on the other hand have started well and have an outside chance of a top 7/8 finish.
You can't win anything starting well, but you can certainly lose a lot starting badly
Like us they've had a lot of injuries, and like us and indeed the vast majority of teams cannot cope with this problem. also we lost two top players in Modric and VDV, they lost an even better one in RVP. Gervinho has shown promise this season, but he's no RVP and was ineffective v Norwich.Arsenal seemed to be going well until Norwich,they continue to confound. I've looked at it and cannot understand why they lost it.