Nothing like a good old change of heart after the deal is done and dusted lmao
Wow.. Is it Giro day.. Good to see you?
Nothing like a good old change of heart after the deal is done and dusted lmao
funny isn't it how nufc are called to task over the morality of business within football?
While other teams are sponsored by gambling companies without a flicker of fuss and the barclays premier league is monopolised by the biggest swindlers going in sky tv.
"a city like newcastle and the region should not have any ties with an organisation like wonga", insists wansbeck mp ian lavery – a season ticket holder at st james' park and regular bandwagon jumper.
"this business makes profits off the back of deprived people who are desperate and who are the most vulnerable in society."
yeah, and i can tell you another business that has been making scandalous profits from often desperate, devoted working class people for years mate... It's called football.
Funny isn't it how NUFC are called to task over the morality of business within football?
While other teams are sponsored by gambling companies without a flicker of fuss and the BARCLAYS Premier League is monopolised by the biggest swindlers going in Sky TV.
"A city like Newcastle and the region should not have any ties with an organisation like Wonga", insists Wansbeck MP Ian Lavery – a season ticket holder at St James' Park and regular bandwagon jumper.
"This business makes profits off the back of deprived people who are desperate and who are the most vulnerable in society."
Yeah, and I can tell you another business that has been making scandalous profits from often desperate, devoted working class people for years mate... It's called FOOTBALL.
I've had a change of heart since beginning this thread. Come to think of it, I'm now pretty much in favour of Wonga. Its a short-term lender, emphasis on the short-term. I read that if one draws £100 on day 1, and on day 10 the entirety is repaid, the interest is £11.12 - not too unreasonable for a "short-term" lender.
The problem is when people use these companies for a long-term fix, but in my opinion there has to be some form of cognitive impairment in those who rely on these companies to solve their long-term financial constraints.
Also, the morality issue is being touched on heavily, but i don't see the difference between this and gambling/casino's sponsoring teams being immoral to those with an addiction, or alcohol companies prying on alcoholics. We were sponsored by the Breweries! Didn't see much of an uproar then.
In my opinion, i think this is just an event that many fans/journo's try and hold against Mike Ashley etc for his previous mistakes. I would like to think he's running quite a good business model now.
Thoughts?
I'm going to say it
I hope one day we are bought buy a billionaire that wants to win something! what happens after that I don't give a ****.
And for me therein lies the problem with English football. We talk about the way the German game is run - all clubs have to be at least 50% owned by the fans, a season ticket for Borussia Dortmund costs £144 a year, there are restrictions on obviously outlandish spending. How brilliant would that be over here? But it takes clubs and supporters to stick together -
"Three years ago, the 50% + 1 rule was challenged by Hannover 96, whose president had visions of Premier League-style stock market flotations, but the Bundesliga clubs solidly upheld it, by 32 votes to Hannover's one (three clubs abstained)."
Instead of just saying, like City and Chelsea fans before us - **** you I don't care because we have loads of money and you don't.
"German football is not perfect but we do not want to be like England, where the clubs are owned by one rich man who puts money in. That causes inflation and instability, and it is in the spirit of clubs for there to be democracy."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/sep/21/german-english-football-recovery
http://www.economist.com/blogs/gametheory/2012/05/german-football-success
Seems someone has fallen for the stadium renaming trick to appease them... hmmm...
Not for the fans as I've already said. Its for the league and FA (possibly government to intervene) and put measures in place. The fans can't do anything while the rules remain in place which allow these kind of deals. Basically I think it is pie in the sky to hope this will change. We've created a monster in the PL and hoping that the billionnaire fat cats are going to be challenged by our weak FA is just not reality.
I agree there are many better models around but don't hold your breath on change!
It would certainly help the national team too which was one of the main reasons for the change in Germany.
I'm going to say it
I hope one day we are bought buy a billionaire that wants to win something! what happens after that I don't give a ****.
I don't understand why MPs are taking a moral high ground about Newcastle having Wonga as a sponsor.
Ignoring the ethical issues with high interest short term lending for a moment. What's the difference between Newcastle players wearing Wonga and Sky having Wonga adverts on in between halfs for a match? What's the difference between every channel and every newspaper taking money off Wonga to advertise? A couple of years ago Wonga paid for the buses in London to run until later in the morning over New Year's Day/Eve, there was a couple of idiots getting on their high horse about it then too but it was soon forgotten. I'm sure the MPs will turn their attention to the next storm in a tea cup they see brewing soon enough.
Anyway, Wonga aren't the only company to make a lot of money in the short term loans market and from what I understand they are one of the best in terms of following the rules set out for such lending. If the MPs don't think what Wonga does is so immoral then they should spend their time trying to change the law, like they're paid to do rather than simply whinging when one legitimate business accepts sponsorship money from another legitimate business.
I just feel sorry for you guys having Wonga on your shirt, it's a bit embarrassing. Spurs fans know all about this, we had our kits made by Pony for several years.
I'm guessing it's because a club is meant to be something different from a company. I'm not sure how true that is, but I suppose a club is meant to represent its members, it's meant to be part of the local community, so who invests in it, sponsors it etc is a little more important.
You're right about the MPs though, maybe if they looked into the reasons why people were using these companies as well, that might be a start.