You've been destroyed by a few players in recent years, haven't you?![]()
none better than him C-Rud, you boys should have gone for him instead of Snotgrass.
You've been destroyed by a few players in recent years, haven't you?![]()
none better than him C-Rud, you boys should have gone for him instead of Snotgrass.

Thing is girls, we lost to a side that will definately be in the top 2 of our division and it could have quite easily been 1-1 at half time, you guys lost to nothing more than a mid-table side.
must admit had to chuckle about the quote about taking the foot of the gas for the final half hour, Fulham took took their foot off after the first half hour.
Anyway compared to your points last year against the sides you have played, how's the improvement going?

didn't say that C-Rud, i just it was better to play well for 44 mins then to play **** for the full 90! can't see how hard that is to understand?

surely its worse to play WELL and lose 6-0!
that to me would be extremely worrying...
we just had a very bad day at the office and came up against a team better than us in every department. the scoreline did not flatter fulham in any way and gave us the wake up call required. you boys however, have made a habit of getting stuffed - how many times have you conceded 3 or more under jewell? i think i read it was a third of your games under his stewardship! that's frightening![]()
Its the lady luck thing supers, everything they done worked (albeit with comedy defending at times) everything we done didn't. not that between the sides really on the pitch, a couple of outstanding players for them thats about it. certainly doesn't deserve knee jerk reaction, we have got more points at this point than i thought we would have, so can't complain really.
squad depth will be our problem this year.
you'll probably get two or three very good results but you'll probably also go on one of those mammoth winless streaks again. even one injury will mess your team about big time. and yet again your best players are going to be loans and you've let important players get into their last year of a deal. lee martin is not a player i rate highly but he's done pretty well for you - you're being run by charlatans
you'll probably get two or three very good results but you'll probably also go on one of those mammoth winless streaks again. even one injury will mess your team about big time. and yet again your best players are going to be loans and you've let important players get into their last year of a deal. lee martin is not a player i rate highly but he's done pretty well for you - you're being run by charlatans
What the band?
squad depth will be our problem this year.

So what was your problem last year then??? What you need is Emile Heskey!!![]()
Hang on ILD, I just have to consult the Norwich book of excuses!
I think we will use excuse number 10,345 - 'To many loan players'

C-Rud you had one huge piss poor excuse, his name was Rodent!

as much as i despise roeder, he was not solely to blame for our relegation, though he was a large factor. we'd been in decline for the previous three seasons since dropping out of the top flight. we'd spent silly money on wages for the likes of earnshaw and all the parachute money was wasted by worthington. this meant we had to resort to freebies and loans as the club was skint and getting more skint by the day. there was also the peter grant factor and the bryan gunn factor to take into account. many people should take the blame for that situation, not just roeder, although as i say, i'm not defending him - he was a horrible man who made horrific mistakes. i just think its too easy and a bit naive to say it was one factor and certainly shouldn't be used as an excuse - the club was rotten from top to bottom and delia and the board was as much to blame as anyone at the time![]()
