After all this faffing about and having put up with this nerve racking thread for so blooming long this lad had better be good.
If he signs this thread should be retired to the hall of fame or perhaps put out to stud.
Not sure that sell-on clause is a great idea. Didn't we agree a fee of £1.5m or something for that? You don't need to be a genius mathematician to see that a 30% sell-on clause will cost us significantly more than that.
Unless we never sell him of course...
Great work from Cortese. We clearly don't have all the cash here and now. The £40-£50 million earned this season is paid over installments to us and following the Pompey fiasco I doubt banks will lend against future income. So to balance our books still and renegotiate with Penarol is a great move. Shows that his old club have great faith in him to do well in the premier league and get a bigger sale in the future.
Well we don't really know the outcome, we'll have to suss out from our Uruguayan friend again.
Of course. Maybe I should have been clearer that in fact that clause sounds so unwise to me that I'm doubtful of its veracity!

Been at reading since thursday night what's the news fellas?
Been at reading since thursday night what's the news fellas?
Been at reading since thursday night what's the news fellas?
FFS, just read the last few pages. How hard is that?
After all this faffing about and having put up with this nerve racking thread for so blooming long this lad had better be good.
Or he could do his cruciate in the first game..
Not sure I am too convinced that reports of a 30% sell on clause are true. We supposedly had already agreed terms with Penarol and it was just Bologna who we needed to sort it with. If we had agreed terms, why would we then back track and agree to a deal that will cost us more in the future? You may think it is as we are paying more upfront, but the fee to Penarol was only minor in terms of the transfer, so I don't see why it would be a problem.
That is definitely glass half empty!