A pretty acurate assessment Col, iv'e put it down as a bad day at the office, we need something Saturday what with City & Chelsea coming next
Good report and agree with the majority.
One point though - Ferdinand - for me he was very shaky indeed - and was nearly always on the wrong side of Graham.
Seems a few thought Ferdinand was worse than I did. For me, he and Hill were exposed badly by the system we played. Didn't think he was "stand out bad" like one or two others!
Agree, him and Hill were exposed time and again.
I comes back to our age old problem of the midfield failing time and again - and tbh that was the exact problem - the midfield didnt support Cisse as they were too deep - and we had too many attacking players in the midfield (who didnt actually attack!) rather than a properly defensive minded player to help Hill and Ferdinand.
There's no point in saying that the midfield were responsible for the goals, we had six players behind the ball when Michu scored his first, courtesy of butterfingers. Bad passing was responsible for most of the goals, it dogged us all last season and it continued yesterday. Give the ball away, particularly chasing a game and you're a dead duck in the PL...
There's no point in saying that the midfield were responsible for the goals, we had six players behind the ball when Michu scored his first, courtesy of butterfingers.
Great read Col.
Watched it live on Internet and agree it was a freak result
Stats on sky said i dont know how accurate they are:
Swansea 7 attempts on target they scored with five
We had one more but scored none
We both had equal pass completion and time on the ball
And we were up on corners.
I think it looked like we trying too hard at times and agree Adel is no good deep at all ... I think this will of hurt them and their egos and I expect something now we can't lose our first five games ... Can we?
I was glad to see QPR as our first game when the fixture list came out because our best chance against you was right out of the gate ... between that and us getting the big breaks & you not really getting any , QPR seemed doomed . I thought the turning point of a very good start for both teams was your keeper let in the first easy one , followed by a stunning save by our keeper . Still think QPR will finish top ten !
Was hoping that unlike me, you wouldn't be so dis-spirited as to lose the will to live, let alone write a Col Report after that farce. Glad to see you're man enough even in the face of disaster mate!
A great and obviously accurate account, as others have said.
Only thing I'd take issue with is Taarabt's positioning being Hughes' fault. Taarabt just loves that deep left-sided position from which to approach his game. With Hoilett there and evidently more than competent, Taarabt had every opportunity to link closer to Cisse. The fact he didn't then (and where similar opportunities arose last year) shows our Messiah's limitations in full focus.
Those limitations include heading the ball. When was the last time he did that? It'd be a great help to have both him and Cisse as central aerial targets when we're attacking.
As for Green, I keep reading that we should give him a chance - but just like nervous airline pilots, you cannot build any level of confidence around a nervous keeper. Maybe he'll man-up but I for one will not be holding my breath all the way to ground zero! Time to recall Cerny and buy in a real prospect.
Exactly, he was being played in the same role as Faurlin would have been playing, he tried to chase back and help out which is more than Hoilett did all game.If that is the case then he should be dropped!!
I can't believe though that MH and his team wouldn't have been up and screaming at him after 20 mins if what you describe were true. I watched the bench yesterday and MH was sat for vitually all of the first half. If Adel had so flagrantly been defying instructions I believe MH would have been up and tearing him a new one.
No....I'm sure Taarabt was told to get on the ball as often as possible and influence the game. Watching from the stands it was obvious that he was playing a deep role which was tactically very wrong. Down to MH for me!!
Exactly, he was being played in the same role as Faurlin would have been playing, he tried to chase back and help out which is more than Hoilett did all game.