The Death Penalty

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
thefanwithnoname

thefanwithnoname

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2011
15,399
5,162
113
NULL
Morning

I see a lot of people who are against the death penalty tend to use the miscarriages of justice as a justification/reason for not having a death penalty.

Whilst i agree that in cases where there have been miscarriages of justice an innocent person would have been killed, and that would be a traversty, I dont feel that this is justification/reasoning for not having the death penalty.

Its more a reason for sorting out the mess that is the 'justice system' where such misacarriages are allowed to happen.

I know there are exceptions to most rules, however, in the case of the majority of the miscarriages of justice it usually ends in those within the justice system having lied/misplaced evidence or simply beaten a false confession out of the victim.
 
You must log in or register to see images


You must log in or register to see images


All dead if you had your way . **** you you racist twat
 
Hash said:
You must log in or register to see images


You must log in or register to see images


All dead if you had your way . **** you you racist twat
Click to expand...

If I had my way the ****s who lied etc in these case would be dead <ok>

As I said miscarriage of Justice usually carried out by those who are supposed to be the beacons of justice
 
thefanwithnoname said:
Morning

I see a lot of people who are against the death penalty tend to use the miscarriages of justice as a justification/reason for not having a death penalty.

Whilst i agree that in cases where there have been miscarriages of justice an innocent person would have been killed, and that would be a traversty, I dont feel that this is justification/reasoning for not having the death penalty.

Its more a reason for sorting out the mess that is the 'justice system' where such misacarriages are allowed to happen.

I know there are exceptions to most rules, however, in the case of the majority of the miscarriages of justice it usually ends in those within the justice system having lied/misplaced evidence or simply beaten a false confession out of the victim.
Click to expand...

Maybe you should have a long hard think about why the death penalty is being more and more concidered as a "barbaric legacy of the past."

Do some research and you might just enlighten yourself a little.
 
Fan what advantages does the death penalty bring? All I can see is there being a slight cost saving to the state instead of a lifetime of incarceration.

It certainly doesn't seem to have any effect in the lowering of homicide rates. America has the highest rate in the civilised world.
 
Drowning them might be more cost efficient in this age of economic recession.
Click to expand...

We could offer all the auld ****ers a witch to burn instead of a winter fuel allowance.

That's some good ole fashioned Toryism right there
 
We should bring back the death penalty, but only for one crime at a time. This crime would be selected completely randomly and would change weekly. So one week it could be burglary, the next week murder, then criminal damage and so on. But don't tell anyone which crime is capital and which aren't. Keep people on their toes.
 
Jip Jaap Stam:3273696 said:
We should bring back the death penalty, but only for one crime at a time. This crime would be selected completely randomly and would change weekly. So one week it could be burglary, the next week murder, then criminal damage and so on. But don't tell anyone which crime is capital and which aren't. Keep people on their toes.
Click to expand...

<laugh>

Sentenced to death for pissing in the street
 
If they drown, they ain't witches.

Anyways, the death penalty means people like you ****s sitting on a jury, deciding who lives or dies. Reason enough not to bring it back I think...
 
COYG:3273856 said:
If they drown, they ain't witches.

Anyways, the death penalty means people like you ****s sitting on a jury, deciding who lives or dies. Reason enough not to bring it back I think...
Click to expand...

Jury only decides guilty or not guilty, prosecutors decide whether they want the death penalty, judge decides if convict gets death penalty.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back