Been reading the reports on this, a lot seems to come from Annis Abraham who is quite clearly upset at the fact that he has had no influence at our club since Sam left. Seems Sam is happy to accept £10m on Langstons behalf, also says this was the original offer. What I want to know is if that's the case why wasn't it accepted before, did Sam try his luck with the Malaysians and they called his bluff? I personally loathe the idea of Hammann having anything to do with this club after the way his exit from this club was conducted.
I hope the Malaysians pay him off, he's been trying his luck for far to long. I think the original offer of 10 mill had too many ifs & buts with it.
langston (ahem) will accept £10m as long as its by the end of the month, in used £20 notes and in an unmarked black leather bag and a first class ticket to Rio.
If anyone can work this out let me know what it means. http://clients.squareeye.net/uploads/oec/CCFCjmnt.pdf
I may be wrong but I think it says the deal was too heavily weighted by Langston. But it was in 2008 so things have obviously changed especially (if you believe WOL) when Sam appears to be happy to accept £10 million on behalf of Langston.
lets pack sams bags for him i say......glad when he`s out of the picture totally. and what a cracker by cracker.....foot in mouth dude!!
And what scam is that? Can't back up your claims can you, nothing new there. Now f'cough and play on the railway line you idiot.
From what I can make out there, Sam needs to hire better lawyers... Every point they made seemed to be disputed in the clubs favour
Hope they give Sam the 10 million and throw Annis in as a extra , wish the new owners would do everything in there powers to get rid of both of them, really gets on my nerves how Annis is given an air of respectability by the media and his association with Sam , if Annis was on of the ones kicking up a fuss and asking for his money back after the rebranding would have hoped the club would obliged and it would be the best money spent in the off season
