When speaking about defending, you said 'solid' once, and then rattled on for numerous paragraphs about how we have to pick someone who can cross. Don't you think that you dusted over the core role of a left back slightly?
And no. Balls to your view on this. 'We don't need someone as good, just someone solid' is this defeatist crap which would constantly keep us at mid-table mediocrity. We should be trying to build year on year. Wtf is the point in selling our best players and then buying no ones who aren't as good, almost on purpose?
We don't 'need' to do anything, but what we actually do will influence where we end up on the table. We can get average 'solid' players and just end up in the middle of the table, or bring in quality and push higher.
The left back is a very important role. Shooting for an average 'solid' player because we don't 'need' to do anything else is just a mad, mad viewpoint.
And if you're trying to get across a different point, then your original post is written completely differently to what you're trying to say. Read it again.