A ridiculous argument? "Look at it from our point of view?" is a ridiculous argument?... Surprised by you.
Rangers have dragged the Scottish game into the gutter?
Three words, Neil Francis Lennon.
How many bans and disciplinaries did he go through? Did rangers cause people to go on strike and and plunge the game into chaos?
You're getting as bad as Harry with the stretching of the truth and mud slinging.
As for debt, I think you'll find that there isn't much between our levels of debt, don't believe everything you read in the papers...
And you are comparing his behaviour to that of Rangers FC and saying what he has been found guilty of is actually worse than Rangers recent actions?
No?
Tell me this, did Neil Francis Lennon endanger the prospects of every club and the Scottish national side by taking his grievances outside of football?
ehhh, referee strike?...
I think everyone knows he did not. He may have had his lawyer shred the SFA's regulations and show how flawed they were, he did not go running to a court of law when it went pear shaped and he did not get "His" way.
To an outsider (and that's what I am) Rangers actions are reprehensible, not only because they have ignored proper channels of appeal, but because by ignoring other means of resolving their complaints they have potentially taken much needed money out of the Scottish game. I am aware that money never really bothered Rangers in the past, but some clubs do have a strategic vision, and therefore plan ahead based upon income. Dundee utd, Hearts, Celtic, Motherwell and St Johnstone need every penny they can get and Rangers blatant attempts to circumvent the SFA rules may have harmed them all.
that you speculating on speculation again?...
Nothing Neil Francis Lennon ever did comes close to the breathtaking arrogance and "I'm all right Jack" attitude Rangers have shown in this case. The fact that some still see fit to defend Rangers' right to take this outsideT of football -and argue that they have been somehow vindicated - I find incredible. So do many others, and not all of them (or even the majority) are Celtic fans.
if ever in doubt blame neil lennon
the difference between our debt and your debt is we can afford it and you can't. you may live in a house that cost you 150k but you have a salary of 50k so you can afford it, you neighbour might have a mtg of 140k but only earns 20k a year. not much difference between the debt but a huge difference in terms of affordability
You must log in or register to see images
It is for the likes of chappers that we need to be truly grateful, because they stood idly by and did **** all whilst their club was pillaged. God bless everyone of them![]()
Well done Chapper !!! The guy is a first class clown that has not got the better of anybody on this board .
Well thanks for the accountancy lesson, you saying that celtics turnover is 150% more than rangers? ie. we bring in 40m, you bring in 100m?...
Sorry about the reality check here but wind it back 12 months and rangers had reduce a £40-50m debt to £18m whilst winning 3 leagues, you were spending and spending just to keep up. Or debt was going down as you were incurring it!

Re wind it 12 months !! You won the league and league cup with players you couldn't afford . You defaulted on Weiss and Jelavic transfer payments even you must see that as cheating . Rangers reduced their debt to 18 million !! You honestly believe that??? I pity you for being so thick .



by ignoring other means of resolving their complaints they have potentially taken much needed money out of the Scottish game
We never defaulted on paying for anyone
George Peat![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Bedoya
http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport...all-short-in-transfer-fee-for-bedoya.16976268
The reducing of the debt allured to earlier was down to Lloyds and Donald Muir in particular (the enemy within)
We never defaulted on paying for anyone
George Peat
Bedoya
http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport...all-short-in-transfer-fee-for-bedoya.16976268
The reducing of the debt allured to earlier was down to Lloyds and Donald Muir in particular (the enemy within)

why is weiss being mentioned as a debt?
we got him on loan from man city and all loan players are free as it takes the players wage bill off their own club costs.
teams taking players on loan just need to agree terms with the player.
